Functional MRI of the Brainstem for Assessing Its Autonomic Functions: From Imaging Parameters and Analysis to Functional Atlas

Abdalla Z. Mohamed,Richard Kwiatek,Peter Del Fante,Vince D. Calhoun,Jim Lagopoulos,Zack Y. Shan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29286
IF: 4.4
2024-02-11
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:Background The brainstem is a crucial component of the central autonomic nervous (CAN) system. Functional MRI (fMRI) of the brainstem remains challenging due to a range of factors, including diverse imaging protocols, analysis, and interpretation. Purpose To develop an fMRI protocol for establishing a functional atlas in the brainstem. Study Type Prospective cross‐sectional study. Subjects Ten healthy subjects (four males, six females). Field Strength/Sequence Using a 3.0 Tesla MR scanner, we acquired T1‐weighted images and three different fMRI scans using fMRI protocols of the optimized functional Imaging of Brainstem (FIBS), the Human Connectome Project (HCP), and the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) project. Assessment The temporal signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (TSNR) of fMRI data was compared between the FIBS, HCP, and ABCD protocols. Additionally, the main normalization algorithms (i.e., FSL‐FNIRT, SPM‐DARTEL, and ANTS‐SyN) were compared to identify the best approach to normalize brainstem data using root‐mean‐square (RMS) error computed based on manually defined reference points. Finally, a functional autonomic brainstem atlas that maps brainstem regions involved in the CAN system was defined using meta‐analysis and data‐driven approaches. Statistical Tests ANOVA was used to compare the performance of different imaging and preprocessing pipelines with multiple comparison corrections (P ≤ 0.05). Dice coefficient estimated ROI overlap, with 50% overlap between ROIs identified in each approach considered significant. Results The optimized FIBS protocol showed significantly higher brainstem TSNR than the HCP and ABCD protocols (P ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, FSL‐FNIRT RMS error (2.1 ± 1.22 mm; P ≤ 0.001) exceeded SPM (1.5 ± 0.75 mm; P ≤ 0.01) and ANTs (1.1 ± 0.54 mm). Finally, a set of 12 final brainstem ROIs with dice coefficient ≥0.50, as a step toward the development of a functional brainstem atlas. Data Conclusion The FIBS protocol yielded more robust brainstem CAN results and outperformed both the HCP and ABCD protocols. Evidence Level 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 1
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?