Comparison of multicenter MRI protocols for visualizing the spinal cord gray matter
Julien Cohen-Adad,Eva Alonso-Ortiz,Stephanie Alley,Maria Marcella Lagana,Francesca Baglio,Signe Johanna Vannesjo,Haleh Karbasforoushan,Maryam Seif,Alan C Seifert,Junqian Xu,Joo-Won Kim,René Labounek,Lubomír Vojtíšek,Marek Dostál,Jan Valošek,Rebecca S Samson,Francesco Grussu,Marco Battiston,Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott,Marios C Yiannakas,Guillaume Gilbert,Torben Schneider,Brian Johnson,Ferran Prados
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29249
Abstract:Purpose: Spinal cord gray-matter imaging is valuable for a number of applications, but remains challenging. The purpose of this work was to compare various MRI protocols at 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T for visualizing the gray matter. Methods: In vivo data of the cervical spinal cord were collected from nine different imaging centers. Data processing consisted of automatically segmenting the spinal cord and its gray matter and co-registering back-to-back scans. We computed the SNR using two methods (SNR_single using a single scan and SNR_diff using the difference between back-to-back scans) and the white/gray matter contrast-to-noise ratio per unit time. Synthetic phantom data were generated to evaluate the metrics performance. Experienced radiologists qualitatively scored the images. We ran the same processing on an open-access multicenter data set of the spinal cord MRI (N = 267 participants). Results: Qualitative assessments indicated comparable image quality for 3T and 7T scans. Spatial resolution was higher at higher field strength, and image quality at 1.5 T was found to be moderate to low. The proposed quantitative metrics were found to be robust to underlying changes to the SNR and contrast; however, the SNR_single method lacked accuracy when there were excessive partial-volume effects. Conclusion: We propose quality assessment criteria and metrics for gray-matter visualization and apply them to different protocols. The proposed criteria and metrics, the analyzed protocols, and our open-source code can serve as a benchmark for future optimization of spinal cord gray-matter imaging protocols.