Abstract:Background: Digital mental health interventions, such as 2-way and asynchronous messaging therapy, are a growing part of the mental health care treatment ecosystem, yet little is known about how users engage with these interventions over the course of their treatment journeys. User engagement, or client behaviors and therapeutic relationships that facilitate positive treatment outcomes, is a necessary condition for the effectiveness of any digital treatment. Developing a better understanding of the factors that impact user engagement can impact the overall effectiveness of digital psychotherapy. Mapping the user experience in digital therapy may be facilitated by integrating theories from several fields. Specifically, health science's Health Action Process Approach and human-computer interaction's Lived Informatics Model may be usefully synthesized with relational constructs from psychotherapy process–outcome research to identify the determinants of engagement in digital messaging therapy. Objective: This study aims to capture insights into digital therapy users' engagement patterns through a qualitative analysis of focus group sessions. We aimed to synthesize emergent intrapersonal and relational determinants of engagement into an integrative framework of engagement in digital therapy. Methods: A total of 24 focus group participants were recruited to participate in 1 of 5 synchronous focus group sessions held between October and November 2021. Participant responses were coded by 2 researchers using thematic analysis. Results: Coders identified 10 relevant constructs and 24 subconstructs that can collectively account for users' engagement and experience trajectories in the context of digital therapy. Although users' engagement trajectories in digital therapy varied widely, they were principally informed by intrapsychic factors (eg, self-efficacy and outcome expectancy), interpersonal factors (eg, the therapeutic alliance and its rupture), and external factors (eg, treatment costs and social support). These constructs were organized into a proposed Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy. Notably, every participant in the focus groups indicated that their ability to connect with their therapist was among the most important factors that were considered in continuing or terminating treatment. Conclusions: Engagement in messaging therapy may be usefully approached through an interdisciplinary lens, linking constructs from health science, human-computer interaction studies, and clinical science in an integrative engagement framework. Taken together, our results suggest that users may not view the digital psychotherapy platform itself as a treatment so much as a means of gaining access to a helping provider, that is, users did not see themselves as engaging with a platform but instead viewed their experience as a healing relationship. The findings of this study suggest that a better understanding of user engagement is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions, and future research should continue to explore the underlying factors that contribute to engagement in digital mental health interventions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04507360; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04507360

To Use or Not to Use: Exploring Therapists' Experiences with Pre-Treatment EMA-Based Personalized Feedback in the TheraNet Project

If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA‐Based Network Models

Therapy as an NLP Task: Psychologists' Comparison of LLMs and Human Peers in CBT

Methodological and Statistical Practices of Using Symptom Networks to Evaluate Mental Health Interventions: A Review and Reflections

Neuropsychological Feedback as a Therapeutic Intervention: The Effective Communication of Assessment Results to Maximize Patient Outcome

An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group Findings

Predicting the outcome of psychotherapy for chronic depression by person‐specific symptom networks

Integrating theory-based and data-driven methods to case conceptualization: A functional analysis approach with ecological momentary assessment

Could neurofeedback improve therapist-patient communication? Considering the potential for neuroscience informed examinations of the psychotherapeutic relationship

A Customized Social Network Platform (Kids Helpline Circles) for Delivering Group Counseling to Young People Experiencing Family Discord That Impacts Their Well-Being: Exploratory Study

Integrating clinician and patient case conceptualization with momentary assessment data to construct idiographic networks: Moving toward personalized treatment for eating disorders

Putting measurement-based care into action: A mixed methods study of the benefits of integrating routine client feedback in coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis

Implementation of a computer-assisted face-to-face intervention for mapping the social support networks of patients with severe mental illness in routine clinical practice: Analysis of the appropriateness and acceptability of the intervention

Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Therapeutic relationship elements and therapy session outcomes: Protocol for a longitudinal study of the patient's perspective

Application of an egocentric social network approach to examine changes in social connections following treatment for anxiety and depression: A novel measurement tool for clinical trials research?

Perceived Causal Problem Networks: Reliability, Central Problems, and Clinical Utility for Depression

Supporting Mental Health Providers: the Feasibility and Promise of a Virtual Professional Learning Community

Patients' and Therapists' Views of Integrated Online CBT for Depression

Formalizing psychological interventions through network control theory