Abstract:Abstract Background Medication optimisation is a global issue with up to 50% of people not taking medicines as prescribed. Numerous interventions have been developed to address this, many of them including feedback on behaviour and outcomes. Understanding patients’ views on such interventions is essential for successful adoption and use. Purpose The purpose of this systematic review is to: (1) Understand patients’ perspectives and experiences of medication adherence feedback interventions and (2) Identify barriers and facilitators which influence their implementation within practice. Methods CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMED, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. The inclusion criteria included; studies with qualitative or mixed method designs describing patients’ perspectives on medication adherence feedback interventions, primary studies with adult participants on long-term medications and studies involving interventions suitable for self-management in primary or community care. Quality assessment was completed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The review was reported using the PRISMA and conducted using ENTREQ guidelines. Data were extracted and analysed using thematic synthesis (NVivo 20). Findings were presented narratively. Results From the 1,031 records screened, ten studies were included. Five studies were conducted in the United States, two in the United Kingdom, and one in the Netherlands, Canada, and Tanzania, respectively. Medication adherence interventions included the use of therapeutic drug monitoring methods and digital adherence technologies such as mHealth and eHealth for people living with asthma, HIV, coronary heart disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes. Patients found interventions acceptable if they were simple to use, allowed control over data sharing options, incorporated audio visual cues, and provided emotional and motivational support. Building trust between patients and healthcare providers and the resulting benefit of shared decision-making were also considered key factors for intervention success. However, developing interventions without user input was identified as a potential barrier to intervention implementation. Patients expressed an overall desire to have interventions tailored to meet their personal needs and preferences, highlighting the importance of placing user needs at the centre of intervention development. Conclusion Placing user needs at the centre of adherence intervention development is crucial for successful implementation. Further research which facilitates user involvement in co-designing interventions to compliment patients’ characteristics and preferences would be key for intervention implementation.

Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review

A Clinical Leadership Lens on Implementing Progress Feedback in Three Countries: Development of a Multidimensional Qualitative Coding Scheme

The effect of feedback-informed cognitive behavioral therapy on treatment outcome: A randomized controlled trial.

Monitoring Treatment Progress and Providing Feedback is Viewed Favorably but Rarely Used in Practice

Beyond outcomes monitoring: measurement feedback systems in child and adolescent clinical practice

Barriers to Progress Feedback Adoption in Outpatient Geriatric Mental Healthcare: Exploring Age-Related Factors - A Qualitative Study

Putting measurement-based care into action: A mixed methods study of the benefits of integrating routine client feedback in coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis

Motives of Therapists for Using Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and How it is Used by Them in Clinical Practice: Two Qualitative Studies

Neuropsychological Feedback as a Therapeutic Intervention: The Effective Communication of Assessment Results to Maximize Patient Outcome

Interventions for improving adherence to psychological treatments for common mental disorders: a systematic review

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Measurement Feedback Systems in Treatment for Common Mental Health Disorders

Prospective evaluation of a clinical decision support system in psychological therapy.

Patient perspectives on systematic client feedback in Dutch outpatient mental healthcare, a qualitative case reports study

Patients' perspectives on feedback interventions to support adherence to long-term medication: a systematic review with thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence

Impact of feedback generation and presentation on self-monitoring behaviors, dietary intake, physical activity, and weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Enhancing the effect of psychotherapy through systematic client feedback in outpatient mental healthcare: A cluster randomized trial.

Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and Feedback: Research Review and Recommendations

The effect of mechanical feedback on outcome in self-care support tool based on solution-focused brief therapy

Bridging the feedback implementation gap: A comparison of empirical and rational decision rules in naturalistic psychotherapy

Transforming the Effectiveness and Equity of a Psychological Therapy Service: A Case Study in the English NHS Talking Therapies Program

Systematic Client Feedback in Youth Mental Health and Addiction Care: A Controlled Study Comparing Two Treatment Cohorts