Abstract:Abstract Objective Treatment of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy has unique clinical challenges in individuals living with spinal cord injuries and diseases (SCI/D). Interventions focused on increasing PAP use have not been studied in this population. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of a program to increase PAP use among Veterans with SCI/D and SDB. Methods Randomized controlled trial comparing a behavioral Intervention (n=32) and educational control (n=31), both including one face-to-face and five telephone sessions over three months. The intervention included education about SDB and PAP, goal setting, troubleshooting, and motivational enhancement. The control arm included non-directive sleep education only. Results Primary outcomes were objective PAP use (nights >=4 hours used within 90 days) and sleep quality (PSQI at 3 months). These did not differ between intervention and control (main outcome timepoint; mean difference 3.5 [-9.0, 15.9] nights/week for PAP use; p=.578; -1.1 [-2.8, 0.6] points for PSQI; p=.219). Secondary outcomes included fatigue, depression, function, and quality of life. Only fatigue improved significantly more in the intervention versus the control group (p=.025). Across groups, more PAP use was associated with larger improvements in sleep quality, insomnia, sleepiness, fatigue and depression at some time points. Conclusions PAP use in Veterans with SCI/D and SDB is low, and a 3-month supportive/behavioral program did not show significant benefit compared to education alone. Overall, more PAP use was associated with improved symptoms suggesting more intensive support, such as in-home assistance, may be required to increase PAP use in these patients.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether an active support program can improve the effectiveness of positive airway pressure (PAP) in treating sleep - disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D). Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive intervention program - "BEST" (Best Practices, Education, Support, and Treatment) in improving PAP compliance, and whether it can significantly increase PAP usage and patients' sleep quality, as well as other related quality - of - life and functional indicators, compared with the control group that only received non - directive sleep education. The paper explores this issue through a randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received a comprehensive behavioral intervention program consisting of six sessions, while the control group received general sleep education. The main outcome measures were the objective use of PAP (i.e., the number of nights with more than 4 hours of use per week within 90 days) and sleep quality (measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]). In addition, secondary outcome measures such as fatigue, depression, function, and quality of life were also evaluated. The research results show that there were no significant differences between the intervention group and the control group in the main outcome measures, indicating that even after intensive intervention, the PAP usage rate of SCI/D patients did not significantly increase. However, more PAP use was associated with greater improvements in sleep quality, insomnia, hypersomnia, fatigue, and depressive symptoms at some time points, suggesting that more intensive support measures, such as home - based assistance services, may be required to further increase the PAP usage rate in these patients.

Intensive support does not improve PAP use in Spinal Cord injury/disease: A randomized clinical trial