0893 Impact of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Older Veterans with Comorbid Chronic Obstructive

Danny Greig,Ruchi Rastogi,Teresa Diaz,Ian Johnston,Poonam Mishra,Maria Tovar-Torres,Clete Kushida,Bradley Axelrod,Lili Zhao,Qurratul Shamim-Uzzaman,Susmita Chowdhuri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0893
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Cognitive impairment in older Veterans is an independent predictor of subsequent mortality and disability. Pilot data indicate that patients with OSA-COPD Overlap Syndrome (OVS) have reduced sleep quality and quality of life (QoL). However, there are no prior systematic studies evaluating treatment paradigms in patients with OVS. Our ongoing clinical trial is investigating whether, compared with usual care, positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy alleviates sleep disturbances, sleepiness, and improves cognitive function and QoL in older adults with OVS. Methods The design is a prospective parallel group randomized controlled trial in Veterans 60 years and older, with moderate-to-severe OSA with concomitant COPD (OVS). 225 eligible participants will be randomized to two treatment groups (PAP and conservative care) in 2:1 ratio for a duration of 6 months. Participants on the conservative care arm are required to follow good sleep habits and sleep hygiene, and on the PAP arm, in addition, are required to be adherent to PAP treatment (CPAP or Bilevel PAP, as required). Sleep questionnaires are administered to evaluate sleepiness, sleep quality, and general and disease specific QoL. Cognitive function is evaluated using Trail Making Test Part A and B, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Stroop Task, Digit Coding, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-R, Weschler Abbreviated Scale Intelligence II, Weschler Memory Scale IV, and Psychomotor Vigilance Test, respectively. All tests are administered at baseline visit, 3 months, and 6 months. Results We have enrolled 222 participants between Detroit and Ann Arbor VAMC locations, randomized 50 participants (48 males, 5 females; age: 70.5±6.5 years, BMI: 29.2±6.3kg/m2, AHI: 44.4±20.9events/hr, spirometry FEV1: 61.6±14.9% predicted, arterial blood gas (n=37) PaCO2:41.3±3.7 mmHg, ESS: 7.6±4.3, Six Minute Walk Test Total Distance Walked: 389.6±105.7 meters, FOSQ Total Score: 17.0±3.5, SGRQ Total Score: 45.6±22.6;30 participants have completed the study per the protocol. Group analysis will be available at the end of the trial. COVID pandemic has negatively impacted enrollment targets. Conclusion Final results from our study will determine the effects of treating a novel target (OVS) to maximize daytime function and QoL, while also providing a framework for early treatment of mild cognitive impairment in vulnerable older Veterans. Support (if any) VHA RR&D # 1I01RX003124-01
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the specific impact of Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) on sleep duration and variability among 9/11 World Trade Center rescue workers. Researchers explored whether CRS leads to shorter sleep duration and higher night-to-night sleep variability by comparing the sleep data of rescue workers with and without CRS symptoms. ### Research Background - **Study Subjects**: 43.5% of World Trade Center rescue and recovery workers exhibited symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis. - **Problem Statement**: Individuals with CRS reported more sleep problems and shorter subjective sleep duration, possibly due to nasal discomfort causing sleep interruptions at night. ### Research Methods - **Participants**: 42 World Trade Center rescue workers, of which 19 (45%) had CRS symptoms and 23 (55%) did not have CRS symptoms. - **Data Collection**: Participants underwent two weeks of actigraphy monitoring and completed sleep diaries. Researchers also collected demographic information, CRS symptoms, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and other data. - **Data Analysis**: The Cole-Kripke algorithm was used to analyze nightly actigraphy data, calculating the average total sleep time (TST) and the coefficient of variation (CV) for night-to-night variability, and group comparisons were made. ### Research Results - **Subjective Sleep Duration**: The CRS+ group had shorter and more variable subjective sleep duration, but the difference was not significant (CRS+: 7.84 hours ± 1.3 hours; CRS-: 8.34 hours ± 0.7 hours, p=0.1). - **Actigraphy-Monitored Sleep Duration**: The CRS+ group had shorter and more variable actigraphy-monitored sleep duration (CRS+: 6.59 hours ± 1.2 hours, CV=22.7 ± 9.5; CRS-: 6.80 hours ± 0.8 hours, CV=20.7 ± 7.2). - **Other Indicators**: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, BMI, and prevalence of sleep apnea. The CRS+ group had a slightly higher Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), but the difference was not significant (CRS+: 8.4 ± 5.4; CRS-: 5.4 ± 5.4, p=0.08). The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores also showed no significant difference between the groups (CRS+: 4.2 ± 2.5; CRS-: 4.6 ± 3.0, p=0.6). ### Conclusion - **Main Findings**: Despite the small sample size and lack of statistical significance, the results suggest that World Trade Center rescue workers with CRS report shorter and more variable subjective sleep duration, and actigraphy-monitored sleep duration is also shorter and more variable. - **Importance**: This finding highlights the importance of further research into the relationship between CRS and sleep quality, especially in this high-risk population, as reduced sleep duration may increase morbidity and mortality. ### Future Directions - **Further Research**: Larger sample size studies are needed to validate these preliminary findings and explore the mechanisms by which CRS affects sleep quality and health.