Abstract:Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common chronic progressive disease resulting in urinary obstruction in aging men. It comes to more and more patients with massive BPH with the aging of society and extension of life expectancy. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy, safety, and complications between transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the treatment of massive BPH. Design and setting: Patients with BPH were divided into the PKEP group and the TURP group randomly. Intraoperative blood loss (BL), operation time (OT), resected tissue weight (RTW), gland resection ratio (GRR), postoperative indwelling ureter time (IUT), bladder fistula time (BFT) and hospital stay time (HST), preoperative and postoperative serum sodium concentration (SSC), hemoglobin concentration (HGB), prostate weight (PW), postvoid residual (PVR), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and other complications were analyzed and compared respectively. Results: There was no statistical difference in preoperative IPSS, preoperative QOL score, preoperative PVR, preoperative Qmax, postoperative QOL score, postoperative PVR, postoperative Qmax, IPSS difference value (DV), Qmax DV, and PVR DV between the PKEP group and the TURP group (p > 0.05). OT, BL, IUT, BFT, HST, and postoperative IPSS in the PKEP group were significantly lower than that in the TURP group (p < 0.01). RTW and GRR in the PKEP group were significantly higher than that in the TURP group (p < 0.01). QOL DV in the PKEP group was higher than that in the TURP group (p < 0.05). There was statistical difference in SSC DV between the PKEP group and the TURP group (p < 0.05). There was significant statistical difference in postoperative PW, postoperative HGB, PW DV, and HGB DV between the PKEP group and the TURP group (p < 0.01). There was significant statistical difference in IPSS, QOL, PVR, and Qmax between postoperative value and preoperative value in both groups (p < 0.01). The incidence of transurethral resection syndrome, obturator nerve reflex, transient urinary incontinence, and retrograde ejaculation between the PKEP group and the TURP group has no statistical difference (p > 0.05). Capsule perforation, blood transfusion, secondary hemorrhage, bladder neck contracture, and urethral stricture in the PKEP group were lower than that in the TURP group (p < 0.05). Bladder spasm in the PKEP group was significantly lower than that in the TURP group (p < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in preoperative and postoperative IIEF-5, effective erectile frequency, telotism average tension, sustainable telotism average time, and sexual dissatisfaction between the PKEP group and the TURP group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: PKEP and TURP have similar clinical efficacy in the treatment of massive BPH. PKEP has advantages in shorter OT, less BL, more GRR, and fewer complications, but the long-term therapeutic effect of PKEP needs further follow-up.

[Semi-radical transurethral resection of the prostate for small benign prostatic hyperplasia]

The value of transurethral cylindrical dilatation of the prostate in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

High-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia patients treated with transurethral resection of prostate

[Twenty-Eight Cases Report of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Combined with Repair of Inguinal Hernia].

Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy (with a Report of 53 Cases)

Comparison between a transurethral prostate split and transurethral prostate resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment in a small prostate volume: a prospective controlled study

A comparative study of two means of simultaneous treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia and bladder stone

[Longterm clinical results of transurethral incision of prostate and bladder neck for benign prostatic hypertrophy]

Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation and Resection of the Prostate Versus Bipolar Resection of the Prostate for Prostates Larger Than 60gr: A Retrospective Study at a Single Academic Tertiary Care Center

An evaluation of transurethral plasma kinetic resection versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic BPH

Selective transurethral resection of the prostate combined with transurethral incision of the bladder neck for bladder outlet obstruction in patients with small volume benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH): a prospective randomized study

Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy with Prostatic Urethra Preservation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Successful treatment of incidental prostate cancer by radical transurethral resection of prostate cancer

[Transurethral columnar balloon dilation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia]

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate versus Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate in the Treatment of Massive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Clinical Efficacy of TKRP Surgery and Its Effect on Serum PSA Level for Treating the Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Comparative Outcomes of Monopolar and Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: An Institutional Perspective

Experience in Diagnosis and Treatment for Small-Size Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Transurethral domestic 1470 nm laser vaporization for the treatment of <30 g small-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia

Study on the efficacy and safety of Transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate in treatment of IV grade Benign prostatic hyperplasia

Endourological treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia in elderly high-risk patients