Shielding working memory from distraction is more effortful than flexible updating

Danae Papadopetraki,Monja Isabel Froboese,Andrew John Westbrook,Bram B. Zandbelt,Roshan Cools
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/743120
2024-05-24
Abstract:Exerting cognitive control is known to carry a subjective effort cost and people are generally biased to avoid it. Recent theorizing suggests that the cost of cognitive effort serves as a motivational signal to bias people away from excessive focusing and towards more cognitive flexibility. We asked whether the effort cost of stable distractor resistance is higher than that of flexible updating of working memory representations. We tested this prediction by using (i) a delayed response paradigm in which we manipulate demands for distractor resistance and flexible updating, as well as (ii) a subsequent cognitive effort discounting paradigm that allows us to quantify subjective effort costs. We demonstrate, in two different samples (28 and 62 participants) that participants discount tasks both high in distractor resistance and flexible updating when comparing with taking a break. As predicted, when directly contrasting distractor resistance and flexible updating the subjective cost of performing a task requiring distractor resistance is higher than that requiring flexible updating.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper examines the influence of two strategies in cognitive control, resistance to interference (ignore) and flexible updating, on individuals' subjective effort cost. Two experiments were conducted using the delayed response paradigm and the cognitive effort discounting paradigm to quantify the demands of these two tasks. The results showed that, compared to tasks requiring resistance to interference, individuals perceived less effort required in tasks that involved flexible updating of working memory. In other words, the cost of resisting interference was higher than that of flexible updating. These findings support a theory that cognitive effort cost may serve as a motivational signal that prompts individuals to balance between focus and flexibility in order to adapt to changing environmental demands.