Abstract:It is well known that people will exert effort on a task if sufficiently motivated, but how they distribute these efforts across different strategies (e.g., efficiency vs. caution) remains uncertain. Past work has shown that people invest effort differently for potential positive outcomes (rewards) versus potential negative outcomes (penalties). However, this research failed to account for differences in the context in which negative outcomes motivate someone - either as punishment or reinforcement. It is therefore unclear whether effort profiles differ as a function of outcome valence, motivational context, or both. Using computational modeling and our novel Multi-Incentive Control Task, we show that the influence of aversive outcomes on one's effort profile is entirely determined by their motivational context. Participants (N:91) favored increased caution in response to larger penalties for incorrect responses, and favored increased efficiency in response to larger reinforcement for correct responses, whether positively or negatively incentivized. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: People have to constantly decide how to allocate their mental effort, and in doing so can be motivated by both the positive outcomes that effort accrues and the negative outcomes that effort avoids. For example, someone might persist on a project for work in the hopes of being promoted or to avoid being reprimanded or even fired. Understanding how people weigh these different types of incentives is critical for understanding variability in human achievement as well as sources of motivational impairments (e.g., in major depression). We show that people not only consider both potential positive and negative outcomes when allocating mental effort, but that the profile of effort they engage under negative incentives differs depending on whether that outcome is contingent on sustaining good performance (negative reinforcement) or avoiding bad performance (punishment). Clarifying the motivational factors that determine effort exertion is an important step for understanding motivational impairments in psychopathology.

Need for cognition moderates the relief of avoiding cognitive effort

Need for cognition moderates cognitive effort aversion

Effort provides its own reward: endeavors reinforce subjective expectation and evaluation of task performance

Neural systems of cognitive demand avoidance

Short-term memory capacity predicts willingness to expend cognitive effort for reward

Do humans prefer cognitive effort over doing nothing?

The role of cognitive effort in subjective reward devaluation and risky decision-making

Taking the path of least resistance now, but not later: Pushing cognitive effort into the future reduces effort discounting

Dispositional cognitive effort investment and behavioral demand avoidance: Are they related?

Motivational context determines the impact of aversive outcomes on mental effort allocation

Too hard, too easy, or just right? The effects of context on effort and boredom aversion

Cognitive effort increases the intensity of rewards

Cognitive task avoidance correlates with fatigue-induced performance decrement but not with subjective fatigue

Dissociable neural after-effects of cognitive and physical effort expenditure during reward evaluation

Losses Motivate Cognitive Effort More Than Gains in Effort-Based Decision Making and Performance

Context effects in cognitive effort evaluation

Generalized Encoding of the Relative Subjective Value of Cognitive Effort in the Dorsal ACC

Overlapping Neural Systems Represent Cognitive Effort and Reward Anticipation

Does effort increase or decrease reward valuation? Considerations from cognitive dissonance theory

The roles of intrinsic motivation and capability-related factors in cognitive effort-based decision-making

Wagers for work: Decomposing the costs of cognitive effort