Abstract:Two types of disruptive effects of irrelevant sound on visual tasks have been reported: the changing-state effect and the deviation effect. The idea that the deviation effect, which arises from attentional capture, is independent of task requirements, whereas the changing-state effect is specific to tasks that require serial processing, has been examined by comparing tasks that do or do not require serial-order processing. While many previous studies used the missing-item task as the nonserial task, it is unclear whether other cognitive tasks lead to similar results regarding the different task specificity of both effects. Kattner et al . ( Memory and Cognition , 2023) used the mental-arithmetic task as the nonserial task, and failed to demonstrate the deviation effect. However, there were several procedural factors that could account for the lack of deviation effect, such as differences in design and procedures (e.g., conducted online, intermixed conditions). In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether the deviation effect could be observed in both the serial-recall and mental-arithmetic tasks when these procedural factors were modified. We found strong evidence of the deviation effect in both the serial-recall and the mental-arithmetic tasks when stimulus presentation and experimental design were aligned with previous studies that demonstrated the deviation effect (e.g., conducted in-person, blockwise presentation of sound, etc.). The results support the idea that the deviation effect is not task-specific. Two types of disruptive effects of irrelevant sound on visual tasks have been reported: the changing-state effect and the deviation effect. The idea that the deviation effect, which arises from attentional capture, is independent of task requirements, whereas the changing-state effect is specific to tasks that require serial processing, has been examined by comparing tasks that do or do not require serial-order processing. While many previous studies used the missing-item task as the nonserial task, it is unclear whether other cognitive tasks lead to similar results regarding the different task specificity of both effects. Kattner et al . ( Memory and Cognition , 2023) used the mental-arithmetic task as the nonserial task, and failed to demonstrate the deviation effect. However, there were several procedural factors that could account for the lack of deviation effect, such as differences in design and procedures (e.g., conducted online, intermixed conditions). In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether the deviation effect could be observed in both the serial-recall and mental-arithmetic tasks when these procedural factors were modified. We found strong evidence of the deviation effect in both the serial-recall and the mental-arithmetic tasks when stimulus presentation and experimental design were aligned with previous studies that demonstrated the deviation effect (e.g., conducted in-person, blockwise presentation of sound, etc.). The results support the idea that the deviation effect is not task-specific.

Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall.

The Effect of Visuospatial Attentional Load on the Processing of Irrelevant Acoustic Distractors

When is forewarned forearmed? Predicting auditory distraction in short-term memory.

Effects of cognitive load on perceived internal and external distraction and their relationship with attentional control

Dissociating Two Forms of Auditory Distraction in a Novel Stroop Serial Recall Experiment

Replicating and extending hemispheric asymmetries in auditory distraction: no metacognitive awareness for the left-ear disadvantage for changing-state sounds

Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study

Psychophysiological Markers of Auditory Distraction: A Scoping Review

Distraction by Auditory Categorical Deviations Is Unrelated to Working Memory Capacity: Further Evidence of a Distinction between Acoustic and Categorical Deviation Effects

Visual Working-Memory Capacity Load Does Not Modulate Distractor Processing

Evidence of a metacognitive illusion in stimulus-specific prospective judgments of distraction by background speech

Revisiting the Deviation Effects of Irrelevant Sound on Serial and Nonserial Tasks

Auditory distraction during reading: Investigating the effects of background sounds on parafoveal processing

Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm

Working memory components modulation of attentional disengagement from evaluative distractor

The surprising robustness of visual search against concurrent auditory distraction.

Threat of shock increases distractor susceptibility during the short-term maintenance of visual information.

Decoding of Working Memory Contents in Auditory Cortex Is Not Distractor-Resistant

Attentional set and explicit expectations of perceptual load determine flanker interference.

The role of auditory transient and deviance processing in distraction of task performance: a combined behavioral and event-related brain potential study

Auditory context-dependent distraction by unexpected visual stimuli