The comparison of corneal higher-order aberration and surgically induced astigmatism between the clear corneal incision and the limbus tunnel incision of posterior chamber implantable collamer lens implantation

Ting-Ting Dan,Tai-Xiang Liu,Hong-yang Luo,Yi-Lu Liao,Zong-Ze Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03311-1
IF: 2.086
2024-01-26
BMC Ophthalmology
Abstract:This study aimed to compare the corneal high-order aberrations and surgically induced astigmatism between the clear corneal incision and limbus tunnel incision for posterior chamber implantable collamer lens (ICL/TICL) implantation.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to compare the effects of clear corneal incision (CCI) and limbus tunnel incision (LTI) on corneal higher - order aberrations and surgically - induced astigmatism in posterior chamber implantable Collamer lens (ICL/TICL) implantation surgery. The study compares the changes in corneal higher - order aberrations (including total root mean square (TRMS) of total activated aberrations, higher - order aberration RMS (HOA RMS), spherical aberration \(Z_{40}\), coma coefficient (Coma RMS) \(Z_{3 - 1}, Z_{31}\)) and surgically - induced astigmatism (SIA) at different time points (1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months) after surgery between the two different incision methods to evaluate the impact of these two incision methods on the surgical results. The study found that within 1 week after surgery, the values of \(Z_{31}\) and \(Z_{40}\) on the posterior corneal surface in the clear corneal incision group were significantly higher than those in the limbus tunnel incision group. Within 1 month after surgery, the SIA on the posterior corneal surface and the total SIA in the clear corneal incision group were also significantly higher than those in the limbus tunnel incision group. However, by 6 months after surgery, the differences in higher - order aberrations and SIA between the two incision methods were no longer significant, indicating that these changes gradually returned to the preoperative level within 6 months after surgery. In conclusion, the main purpose of this study is to explore the advantages and disadvantages of clear corneal incision and limbus tunnel incision in ICL/TICL implantation surgery through detailed measurement and analysis, and to provide a scientific basis for clinical selection of appropriate surgical incision methods.