Surface Nitrogen-Injection Engineering for High Formation Rate of CO 2 Reduction to Formate
Han Cheng,Si Liu,Jingda Zhang,Tianpei Zhou,Nan Zhang,Xu-sheng Zheng,Wangsheng Chu,Zhenpeng Hu,Changzheng Wu,Yi Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02144
IF: 10.8
2020-07-06
Nano Letters
Abstract:In this study, we highlight that surface nitrogen-injection engineering brings a high formation rate for CO<sub>2</sub> reduction to formate, which is high level among the reported electrocatalysts. Surface nitrogen-injection engineering can increase the amounts of active sites and optimize the electronic structure simultaneously. Taking an example of SnS<sub>2</sub> precursors, the final-obtained surface N-enriched Sn(S) nanosheets (denoted as N–Sn(S) nanosheets) exhibit a 5-fold of current density and 2.45-fold of Faradaic efficiency than pristine SnS<sub>2</sub> derived Sn(S) nanosheets (denoted as Sn(S) nanosheets). On account of high activity and selectivity, the formation rate of formate is 14 times than that of pristine samples and reaches up to 1358 μmol h<sup>–1</sup> cm<sup>–2</sup>. Moreover, this strategy is proven to be general to other metal sulfides, such as CuS and In<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub>. We anticipate that surface nitrogen-injection engineering offers new avenues to rational design of advanced electrocatalysts for CO<sub>2</sub> reduction reaction.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02144?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02144</a>.Experimental details, synthesis of N–Sn(S) electrocatalysts (Figure S1), the TEM images of electrocatalysts (Figure S2), the XRD patterns of electrocatalysts (Figure S3), the EDS mapping of precursors (Figure S4), the Raman spectra of precursors (Figure S5), the HRTEM images of electrocatalysts (Figure S6), the XAFS results of electrocatalysts (Figure S7), the N K-edge XANES spectra (Figure S8), element content in XPS survey (Figure S9), the AFM characterization (Figure S10), the standard curve of formate production (Figure S11), the gas diffusion electrochemical cell (Figure S12), structure analysis after CO<sub>2</sub>RR (Figure S13), the activity and selectivity of CuS and N-CuS (Figure S14), the activity and selectivity of In<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> and N–In<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> (Figure S15), the XRD patterns of CuS and In<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> (Figure S16), the EDLC measurements and CO<sub>2</sub> temperature-programmed desorption (Figure S17), the comparisons of reported electrocatalysts (Figure S18), the additional chronoamperometry measurements (Figure S19), XPS analysis after CO<sub>2</sub>RR (Figure S20), repeatability analysis of electrocatalysts (Figure S21), different concentrations of electrolyte tests (Figure S22), entropy and zero-point energies for adsorbates (Figure S23), time frame of the measurements for XAFS (Figure S24), FTIR comparison (Figure S25), XPS analysis after CO<sub>2</sub> reduction reaction (Figure S26) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02144/suppl_file/nl0c02144_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,nanoscience & nanotechnology