A cross-sectional study to test equivalence of low- versus intermediate-flip angle dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI measures of relative cerebral blood volume in patients with high-grade gliomas at 1.5 Tesla field strength
Mark S. Shiroishi,Dane Weinert,Steven Y. Cen,Bino Varghese,Timothy Dondlinger,Melissa Prah,Jesse Mendoza,Sina Nazemi,Nima Ameli,Negin Amini,Salman Shohas,Shannon Chen,Bavrina Bigjahan,Gabriel Zada,Thomas Chen,Josh Neman-Ebrahim,Eric L. Chang,Frances E. Chow,Zhaoyang Fan,Wensha Yang,Frank J. Attenello,Jason Ye,Paul E. Kim,Vishal N. Patel,Alexander Lerner,Jay Acharya,Leland S. Hu,C. Chad Quarles,Jerrold L. Boxerman,Ona Wu,Kathleen M. Schmainda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1156843
IF: 4.7
2023-09-20
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:Introduction: 1.5 Tesla (1.5T) remain a significant field strength for brain imaging worldwide. Recent computer simulations and clinical studies at 3T MRI have suggested that dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI using a 30° flip angle ("low-FA") with model-based leakage correction and no gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) preload provides equivalent relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measurements to the reference-standard acquisition using a single-dose GBCA preload with a 60° flip angle ("intermediate-FA") and model-based leakage correction. However, it remains unclear whether this holds true at 1.5T. The purpose of this study was to test this at 1.5T in human high-grade glioma (HGG) patients. Methods: This was a single-institution cross-sectional study of patients who had undergone 1.5T MRI for HGG. DSC-MRI consisted of gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GRE-EPI) with a low-FA without preload (30°/P-); this then subsequently served as a preload for the standard intermediate-FA acquisition (60°/P+). Both normalized (nrCBV) and standardized relative cerebral blood volumes (srCBV) were calculated using model-based leakage correction (C+) with IBNeuroTM software. Whole-enhancing lesion mean and median nrCBV and srCBV from the low- and intermediate-FA methods were compared using the Pearson's, Spearman's and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: Twenty-three HGG patients composing a total of 31 scans were analyzed. The Pearson and Spearman correlations and ICCs between the 30°/P-/C+ and 60°/P+/C+ acquisitions demonstrated high correlations for both mean and median nrCBV and srCBV. Conclusion: Our study provides preliminary evidence that for HGG patients at 1.5T MRI, a low FA, no preload DSC-MRI acquisition can be an appealing alternative to the reference standard higher FA acquisition that utilizes a preload.
oncology