Abstract:Low‐field scanners are cheaper alternatives that can improve accessibility to MRI while bringing challenges such as lower signal‐to‐noise ratio efficiency (SNRe). Using MRI fingerprinting (MRF), phantom and volunteers were scanned in a 0.55T scanner to assess the SNRe and accuracy. Measurements showed excellent repeatability and correlation with reference measurements. Low‐field strength scanners present an opportunity for more inclusive imaging exams and bring several challenges including lower signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and longer scan times. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a rapid quantitative multiparametric method that can enable multiple quantitative maps simultaneously. To demonstrate the feasibility of an MRF sequence for knee cartilage evaluation in a 0.55T system we performed repeatability and accuracy experiments with agar‐gel phantoms. Additionally, five healthy volunteers (age 32 ± 4 years old, 2 females) were scanned at 3T and 0.55T. The MRI acquisition protocols include a stack‐of‐stars T1ρ‐enabled MRF sequence, a VIBE sequence with variable flip angles (VFA) for T1 mapping, and fat‐suppressed turbo flash (TFL) sequences for T2 and T1ρ mappings. Double‐Echo steady‐state (DESS) sequence was also used for cartilage segmentation. Acquisitions were performed at two different field strengths, 0.55T and 3T, with the same sequences but protocols were slightly different to accommodate differences in signal‐to‐noise ratio and relaxation times. Cartilage segmentation was done using five compartments. T1, T2, and T1ρ values were measured in the knee cartilage using both MRF and conventional relaxometry sequences. The MRF sequence demonstrated excellent repeatability in a test–retest experiment with model agar‐gel phantoms, as demonstrated with correlation and Bland–Altman plots. Underestimation of T1 values was observed on both field strengths, with the average global difference between reference values and the MRF being 151 ms at 0.55T and 337 ms at 3T. At 0.55T, MRF measurements presented significant biases but strong correlations with the reference measurements. Although a larger error was present in T1 measurements, MRF measurements trended similarly to the conventional measurements for human subjects and model agar‐gel phantoms.

B1-MRF: Large dynamic range MRF-based absolute B 1 + mapping in the human body at 7T

3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting on a low-field 50 mT point-of-care system prototype: evaluation of muscle and lipid relaxation time mapping and comparison with standard techniques

Free-breathing, Non-Ecg, Simultaneous Myocardial T1 , T2 , T2 *, and Fat-Fraction Mapping with Motion-Resolved Cardiovascular MR Multitasking.

Three-dimensional Simultaneous Brain Mapping of T1, T2, T2*and Magnetic Susceptibility with MR Multitasking

Technical feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting on a 1.5T MRI-Linac

Magnetic resonance field fingerprinting

Free-breathing qRF-MRF with pilot tone respiratory motion navigator for T1, T2, T2*, and off-resonance mapping of the human body at 3 T

Rapid B1 Field Mapping at 3 T Using the 180° Signal Null Method with Extended Flip Angle

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the pancreas at 1.5 T and 3.0 T

Quantitative Brain Mapping Using Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting on a 50-Mt Portable MRI Scanner

Deep learning‐based whole‐brain B1+‐mapping at 7T

MARVEL: MR Fingerprinting with Additional micRoVascular Estimates using bidirectional LSTMs

Fast 3D 31P B 1 + mapping with a weighted stack of spiral trajectory at 7 T

Only-train-once MR fingerprinting for B0 and B1 inhomogeneity correction in quantitative magnetization-transfer contrast

Fast 3D 31P B1+ mapping with a weighted stack of spiral trajectory at 7 Tesla

Fast 3D 31P B1+ mapping with a weighted stack of spiral trajectory at 7 T

Feasibility of 3D MRI fingerprinting for rapid knee cartilage T1, T2, and T1ρ mapping at 0.55T: Comparison with 3T

Phase-sensitive deep reconstruction method for rapid multiparametric MR fingerprinting and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain

Upper-body free-breathing Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting applied to the quantification of water T1 and fat fraction

Phase-sensitive B-1 Mapping: Effects of Relaxation and RF Spoiling

Simultaneous T1 , T2 , and T1ρ relaxation mapping of the lower leg muscle with MR fingerprinting