Abstract:A competitive firm is considered to be inefficient when its observed profit falls short of the maximum possible profit at the applicable prices of inputs and outputs. Two alternative measures of performance of the firm are the ratio of the actual to the maximum profit and the difference between the maximum and the actual profit. The ratio measures its profit efficiency and is naturally bounded between 0 and 1 so long as the actual profit is strictly positive. However, the possibility of negative actual profit and zero profit at the maximum has prompted many researchers to opt for the difference measure of profit inefficiency, which is necessarily non-negative. For a meaningful comparison of performance across firms, however, the difference needs to be appropriately normalized to take account of differences in the scale of operation of firms. Three common variables used for normalization are the observed cost, the observed revenue, and the sum of revenue and cost. It is a common practice to measure the separate contributions of technical and allocative efficiencies to the overall profit efficiency of the firm. When the firm is not operating on the frontier of the production possibility set, there are many ways to project it on to the frontier. This leads to different decomposition of profit efficiency into technical and allocative components. In this paper, we consider McFadden's gauge function and an endogenous projection based on the overall efficiency of the firm along with the usual input- or output-oriented distance functions, the graph hyperbolic distance function, and a slack-based Pareto Koopmans efficiency measure for technical efficiency. We show that in a multiplicative decomposition of profit efficiency, the technical efficiency component of profit efficiency is independent of input-output prices only from the projection based on the gauge function. Also, an empirical application using data from Indian banks shows that the alternative normalized difference measures of inefficiency generate different performance ranking of the firms. Thus, comparative evaluation of performance of firms depends on the analyst's preference for a specific type of normalization.

Estimation of Profit Functions When Profit Is Not Maximum

Measurement and decomposition of profit efficiency under alternative definitions in nonparametric models

Resource Allocation in Multi-Divisional Multi-Product Firms

A Revenue-Function Approach to the Measurement of Output-Substitution Possibilities in Agriculture

An Empirical Test of Utility vs. Profit Maximization in Agricultural Production

Limits to Profit Maximization as a Guide to Behavior Change

The flexible reverse approach for decomposing economic inefficiency: With an application to Taiwanese banks

Prices, Profits, Proxies, and Production

Production function estimation using subjective expectations data

AN EXPERIMENTAL METHOD FOR PROFIT MAXIMIZATION

An Explanation of Inefficiency in Markets and A Justification for Buy-And-Hold Strategies

Estimating production functions using costs when outputs are restricted

How to Generate Good Profit Maximization Problems

Timing Assumptions and Efficiency: Empirical Evidence in a Production Function Context

Endogeneity-corrected stochastic frontier with market imperfections

On the Non-Identification of Revenue Production Functions

Nonparametric estimation of allocative efficiency using indirect production theory: Application to container ports in Norway

A conjecture on the distribution of firm profit

Estimating the Cost of Capital and the Profit Share

Quantifying the Gap between Equilibrium and Optimum Under Monopolistic Competition