Abstract:The conventional functional form of the Constant-Elasticity-of-Substitution (CES) production function is a general production function nesting a number of other forms of production functions. Examples of such functions include Leontief, Cobb–Douglas, and linear production functions. Nevertheless, the conventional form of the CES production specification is still restrictive in multiple aspects. One example is the fact that the marginal effect of increasing input use always has to be to increase the variability of output quantity by the conventional construction of this function. This paper proposes a generalized variant of the CES production function that allows for various input effects on the probability distribution of output. Failure to allow for this possible input–output risk structure is indeed one of the limitations of the conventional form of the CES production function. This limitation may result in false inferences about input-driven output risk. In light of this, the present paper proposes a solution to this problem. First, it is shown that the familiar CES formulation suffers from very restrictive structural assumptions regarding risk considerations, and that such restrictions may lead to biased and inefficient estimates of production quantity and production risk. Following the general theme of Just and Pope’s approach, a CES-based production-function specification that overcomes this shortcoming of the original CES production function is introduced, and a three-stage Nonlinear Least-Squares (NLS) estimation procedure for the estimation of the proposed functional form is presented. To illustrate the proposed approaches in this paper, two empirical applications in irrigation and fertilizer response using the famous Hexem–Heady experimental dataset are provided. Finally, implications for modeling input-driven production risks are discussed.

A Revenue-Function Approach to the Measurement of Output-Substitution Possibilities in Agriculture

Multi-Output Broadacre Agricultural Production: Estimating A Cost Function Using Quasi-Micro Farm Level Data from Australia

A Translog Cost Function Analysis of U.S. Agriculture, 1939–77

Input Substitution, Productivity Performance and Farm Size

An Empirical Test of Utility vs. Profit Maximization in Agricultural Production

Technical and environmental inefficiency measurement in agriculture using a flexible by‐production stochastic frontier model

Economic elasticities of input substitution using data envelopment analysis

Elasticity of Substitution between Machines and Labor in China's Agricultural Production ——A Comparison Based on Various Elasticity Estimations

Price Elasticity of the Marketed Surplus of a Subsistence Crop

A Shadow‐Price Frontier Measurement of Profit Efficiency in Chinese Agriculture

On the Non-Identification of Revenue Production Functions

Measuring public agricultural research and extension and estimating their impacts on agricultural productivity: new insights from U.S. evidence

A Method for Estimating Output Elasticity of Input Factors in Cobb-Douglas Production Function and Measuring Agricultural Technological Progress

Estimation of Profit Functions When Profit Is Not Maximum

Theory for Extending Single-Product Production Function Estimation to Multi-Product Settings

Econometric Modeling of Input-Driven Output Risk through a Versatile CES Production Function

Nitrogen‐Land Substitution in Corn Production: A Reconciliation of Aggregate and Firm‐Level Evidence

Generalizing the General: generalizing the CES production function to allow for the viability of input thresholds

An alternative method of measuring economic efficiency: The case of grain production in China

Measuring Output, Input and Total Factor Productivity in Australian Agriculture: an Industry‐Level Analysis

Supply, Demand, and Technology in a Multiproduct Industry: Texas Field Crops