Abstract:Statement of problem: Although the intraoral scanning of edentulous ridges is feasible, clinical evidence that the resulting denture retention is equivalent to that achieved with conventional impressions is lacking. Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the retention of complete denture bases fabricated from digital intraoral scans versus conventional impressions by using border molding and posterior palatal seal compression. Material and methods: Twenty volunteers with an edentulous maxilla were recruited. An intraoral scan of the maxilla and a conventionally border-molded impression with a custom tray were made. The conventional impression was poured; the definitive cast was scanned. Three-dimensionally (3D) printed (PB1) and milled bases (MB1) were fabricated based on the scan of the definitive cast. Based on the intraoral scan, a 3D printed (PB2) and a milled base (MB2) were fabricated. On each base, a platform with a hook consisting of a central notch orienting the force against the post dam (PD) and 2 lateral notches orienting the forces against the left (LT) and right (RT) tuberosities was set in the center of the outer surface of the base. A traction dynamometer was inserted in the hook and oriented into the corresponding notch by applying force until dislodgement. All bases were subsequently stored in artificial saliva for 2 weeks and scanned. Retention testing was repeated by using the same procedure. To evaluate trueness and to visualize the differences on a color map, the scan of the definitive cast and the intraoral scans were matched and compared in 3 dimensions. The Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the retention of the different bases (95% confidence interval, α=.05). Results: Nineteen participants with a mean ±standard deviation age of 64.1 ±14.7 years completed the 4 study sessions. The retention of printed bases (PD: 16.08 ±15.28 N; LT: 14.98 ±14.72 N; RT: 11.28 ±9.57 N) and milled bases (PD:14.52 ±17.07 N; RT: 11.99 ±12.10 N; LT: 13.55 ±15.53 N) fabricated from conventional impressions presented significantly higher retentive forces than those printed (PD: 6.21 ±4.72 N; RT:5.12 ±2.78 N; LT: 4.45 ±2.77 N) and milled (PD: 6.58 ±4.92 N; RT: 4.65 ±2.63 N; LT: 5.02 ±3.58 N) from the intraoral scans (P<.05). The differences were significant in all directions of dislodgement, as well as after storage in artificial saliva for 2 weeks. Comparison of the 3D distances between the intraoral scan and the definitive cast revealed a mean deviation of 0.45 ±0.11 mm. Conclusions: Conventional impressions of the edentulous maxilla, including the clinical steps of border molding and posterior palatal seal compression, provide better retention than digital intraoral scans with both milled and 3D printed denture bases.

Comparison of denture space and patient satisfaction for neutral zone versus standard‐designed digital dentures restoring mandibular resorbed ridges: A crossover randomized clinical trial

[Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of a Kind of Digital Complete Denture].

Accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillary full-arch screw-retained prosthesis: A crossover randomized trial

Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part II - conventional impressions versus digital scans: A clinical controlled crossover study

Patient-reported outcome measures compared to professional dental assessments of monolithic ZrO2 implant fixed dental prostheses in complete digital workflows: A double-blind crossover randomized controlled trial

Occlusal Assessment Of Zirconia Crowns Designed With The Digital Articulator And Traditional Methods

Complete denture palatal rugae design impact on satisfaction and quality of life

Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part I - Conventional versus CAD-CAM methods: A clinical controlled crossover study

Comparison of Direct Intraoral Scan and Traditional Impression for CAD/CAM Mandibular Overdenture Base: RCT on Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes

Oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction using three-dimensional printed dentures: A crossover randomized controlled trial

Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures

Digital analysis of fabrication accuracy and fit in additively and subtractively manufactured implant-supported fixed complete dentures

Single posterior implant-supported restorations fabricated using a scannable healing abutment versus a conventional scan body: A randomized controlled trial

Change of Polished Surface Contours on Mandibular Complete Denture Base in Different Residual Ridge Resorption Situation:A Pilot Study

Impact of crestal bone resorption on quality of life and professional maintenance with conventional dentures or Locator-retained mandibular implant overdentures

Clinical evaluation of closed tray impression and intraoral scanning techniques in single posterior tissue-level implant-supported crowns: A self-controlled case study

Effect of two esthetic digitally produced materials used in fabrication of extracoronal attachments on the stresses Induced in removable partial dentures

Clinical comparative study of lingualized and anatomical occlusal pattern of complete dentures in mandible with severely ab-sorbed alveolar ridge

Comparison of dental movements in digital setups created by orthodontists and "3shape design service®" engineers: A cross-sectional study

Patient satisfaction with occlusal scheme of conventional complete dentures: A randomised clinical trial (Part II)

Clinical outcomes of milled, 3D‐printed, and conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis