Abstract:There has recently been an increasing trend to shift the fabrication of complete dentures from conventional to digital workflows to shorten the treatment time and increase patient comfort and satisfaction. Digital fabrication of complete dentures can be achieved either by a subtractive process (milling) or by an additive technique (3D printing). The milling process offers numerous advantages; however, they require large-size production machines and are associated with low production efficiency, increased cost, limited block size, and a considerable waste of material. On the other hand, 3D printing technology can potentially offer the benefits of lower manufacturing and equipment costs, good surface details, and lower material waste. Hence, 3D printing is being considered lately by some researchers as a valid choice for manufacturing digital dentures. Therefore, the aim of the current review was to identify and highlight studies on 3D-printed dentures, mainly those investigating clinical and patient-centered outcomes. A search was conducted using the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 16 studies that investigated clinical outcomes (masticatory efficiency, biting force, retention and stability, computerized occlusal analysis, and post-insertion maintenance) as well as patient-based outcomes (patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), patient-related complications, patient preference, and willingness to pay) were included. After a thorough review and discussion of these articles, it could be concluded that 3D printing of complete dentures offers many advantages from both a clinical and patient-based perspective. Retention and comfort with 3D-printed dentures were found to be comparable or even superior to conventional dentures. Moreover, retention of 3D-printed dentures constructed from conventional impressions and digitized casts demonstrated improved retention when compared to a protocol adopting intraoral scanning (digital impressions). Masticatory efficiency, biting force, OHRQoL, and patient satisfaction with 3D-printed dentures varied and were inconsistent among the included studies. Most of the studies reported positive results in the different domains and assessed aspects, while others reported some concerns (especially in terms of aesthetics and phonetics). With regard to post-insertion maintenance, printed dentures showed comparable results to conventional dentures in the short term. The technique seems promising with numerous benefits; however, further clinical research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is still needed to confirm these conclusions and address the potential concerns.

Oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction using three-dimensional printed dentures: A crossover randomized controlled trial

A randomized controlled trial of the different impression methods for the complete denture fabrication: Patient reported outcomes

Patient satisfaction with laser-sintered removable partial dentures: A crossover pilot clinical trial

An Investigative Study on the Oral Health Condition of Individuals Undergoing 3D-Printed Customized Dental Implantation

Quantitative Evaluation of Edentulous Maxillomandibular Relationship Record Using Diagnostic Complete Dentures Fabricated by CAD and 3D Printing

Evaluation of functional suitable digital complete denture system based on 3D printing technology

Patient-reported outcome measures compared to professional dental assessments of monolithic ZrO2 implant fixed dental prostheses in complete digital workflows: A double-blind crossover randomized controlled trial

[Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of a Kind of Digital Complete Denture].

3D-Printed Complete Dentures: A Review of Clinical and Patient-Based Outcomes

Clinical outcomes of milled, 3D‐printed, and conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

[Comparison of the effects of removable dentures made by 3D printing and traditional casting methods on patients' subjective feelings]

Evaluation of masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for conventional and 3D-printed implant overdentures: a randomized crossover study

Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures

Clinical Evaluation of a One-Piece Polyetheretherketone Removable Partial Denture Fabricated Using a Novel Digital Workflow: A Self-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Fully digital versus conventional workflow: Are removable complete overdentures equally good? A randomized crossover trial

Accuracy of Tooth Positioning in 3D-Printing Aided Manufactured Complete Dentures: an in Vitro Study.

Eighteen Months Follow-Up with Patient-Centered Outcomes Assessment of Complete Dentures Manufactured Using a Hybrid Nanocomposite and Additive CAD/CAM Protocol

CAD/CAM versus traditional complete dentures: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of patient‐ and clinician‐reported outcomes and costs

The effect of bioelectric and manual impressions on quality of complete dentures and quality of life: A cross over pilot study

Intaglio surface trueness of dentures bases fabricated with 3D printing vs. conventional workflow: a clinical study

A retrospective cohort study on 3D printed temporary crowns