Abstract:Capturing CO2 out of flue gases emitted from power plants is an efficient way to alleviate the greenhouse gas effect. The commonly used method to capture CO2 is to chemically absorb it with amine solutions. The mostly used are aqueous solutions and the aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) is an effective choice to absorb CO2 with high reaction rate. However, the regeneration energy consumption is too high to be applied into industry efficiently. The main reason is due to the high boiling point, thus the non-aqueous solvent is a good alternative. In this paper, experiment is carried out to investigate the substituteion of water by methanol as the boiling point of it is no more than 343 K. during the experiment, 30%wt MEA aqueous and non-aqueous solutions were studied to absorb CO2 and the pure CO2 gases and simulated gas mixture of 12% CO2 and 88% N2 were studied, respectively. The jacket reactor was used to control the reaction temperature and the jacket spiral cooling pipe was used to cool the outlet gases from the reactor and separate the evaporated solutions. The temperature of the cooling water is 20°C. With the gas flow meter, it is easy to control and record the gas mass flow. And the gas analyzer was used to analyze the component of the mixed outlet gas. Every reaction courses were repeated several times to validate the accuracy. After the compensation of temperature, zero and evaporation, the absorption results were achieved and the CO2 absorption rate along time was obtained and absorption capacities in aqueous and nonaqueous solutions were easily observed. The results show that when the gas is pure CO2, the reaction rates for MEA aqueous solution is higher than that of non-aqueous solution at first, however, the different gap is little. Then after about 15 min, the reaction rate for MEA non-aqueous solution becomes higher than that of aqueous one as its reaction rate decreases. And the absorption capacity of non-aqueous solution is almost 0.1 mol CO2/mol MEA higher than that of aqueous solution. For the mixed gases, the reaction process is much lower than that of the pure CO2 gas. The results show that during the reaction process, the reaction rate of CO2 absorbing in non-aqueous solution is higher than that of aqueous and the CO2 absorption capacity in non-aqueous solution is also larger than that of aqueous. Also, the reaction time for pure CO2 is about 50min and for mixed gas is about 140min. Hence, the non-aqueous solutions have better CO2 absorption performance than the aqueous ones. Also, regeneration experiments were performed and the results show that the temperature ranges of 60-70°C are suitable for the CO2 loaded MEA-methanol solutions. When the temperature is higher than 70°C, methanol is preferable to be evaporated than the CO2 to be regenerated. Thus, the suitable regeneration temperature for MEA-methanol solution is no more than 70°C, which can reduce a large amount of energy in CO2 regeneration process. However, the obvious disadvantage for the non-aqueous solution is that the evaporation of the solution (methanol)

Heat of absorption of CO 2 in 30 wt% MEA with monoethyleneglycol and urea as vapour reduction additives

Experimental Study of the Absorption and Regeneration Performance of Several Candidate Solvents for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture

Selection of Blended Solvents for CO2 Absorption from Coal-Fired Flue Gas. Part 1: Monoethanolamine (Mea)-Based Solvents

Experimental Study Of Co2 Solubility In High Concentration Mea Solution For Intensified Solvent-Based Carbon Capture

Integration Study of a Hybrid Solvent MEA-Methanol for Post Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture in Packed Bed Absorption and Regeneration Columns

Experiment Study on CO 2 Absorption and Desorption in the Non-Aqueous Blended Solutions of MEA and Methanol

Comparison of Absorption and Regeneration Performance for Post-Combustion Co2 Capture by Mixed Mea Solvents

Effects of Non-Aqueous Solvents on CO2 Absorption in Monoethanolamine: Ab Initio Calculations

Estimation of Diffusivity and Intermolecular Interaction Strength of Secondary and Tertiary Amine for CO2 Absorption Process by Molecular Dynamic Simulation

Evaluating Solvent Efficiency for Carbon Capture: Comparative Analysis of Temperature, Concentration and Diffusivity Effects

Experimental Study on a New High-Efficiency Aqueous Solvent Based on a Blend of N-MethyDiEthanolAmine and TriEthylene TetrAmine for the CO2 Capture

Experimental And Rate-Based Modeling Study Of Co2 Capture By Aqueous Monoethanolamine

Viscosity Data of Aqueous MDEA–[Bmim][BF 4 ] Solutions Within Carbon Capture Operating Conditions

CO2 Heat of Absorption in Aqueous Solutions of MDEA and MDEA/Piperazine

Low-temperature desorption in thermomorphic solvents for CO 2 capture: Systems with N-methylcyclohexylamine and N,N-Dimethylcyclohexylamine

Heat of Absorption of Co2 in Aqueous Ammonia and Ammonium Carbonate/Carbamate Solutions

Experimental Analysis of Reaction Heat of CO2 Absorption of Phase Change Absorber AEP-DPA at Low Partial Pressure

Computational Investigation of Co-Solvent Influence on CO2 Absorption and Diffusion in Water Lean Solvents

Exploiting an Alternative Co2 Absorption Process by Efficient Solvent Mixture

Investigation on CO2 Capture Performance of Low-Viscosity Diamine Non-Aqueous Absorbents with N-methyldiethanolamine Regulation

Assessment of Novel Solvent System for CO2 Capture Applications