Implications of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures among patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Nura Abdel-Rahman,Orly Manor,Einat Elran,David Siscovick,Ronit Calderon-Margalit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-024-00592-1

2024-02-03

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research

Abstract:For the past two decades, the assessment of the quality of diabetes care has mostly relied on clinical quality indicators. These have not included Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) which provide information on outcomes deemed valuable by patients. We aimed to examine the potential utility of PROMs in type 2 diabetes care and to study the association of PROMs with patients' characteristics and clinical quality indicators.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore the potential application value of patient - reported outcome measures (PROMs) in type 2 diabetes care and study the associations between PROMs and patient characteristics as well as clinical quality indicators. Specifically, the authors hope to achieve the following through this study:

1. **Evaluate the potential utility of PROMs in type 2 diabetes care**: PROMs are a type of information directly obtained from patients regarding their functional status or feelings, which may not be fully reflected in traditional clinical indicators. Therefore, researchers hope to understand whether PROMs can provide important information about patients' self - reported health status, thereby reflecting other aspects of care quality.

2. **Study the relationships between PROMs and patient characteristics and clinical quality indicators**: By analyzing the relationships between PROMs and patients' sociodemographic characteristics such as gender, age, education level, comorbidities, etc., as well as clinical quality indicators (such as HbA1c, LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, etc.), researchers hope to reveal how these factors affect patients' self - reported health status.

### Research Background
In recent years, healthcare has increasingly focused on patient - centeredness rather than relying solely on clinical indicators to assess care quality. Although clinical indicators are very important for assessing care quality, they may not be able to comprehensively capture all relevant outcomes of care. As a supplementary tool, PROMs can provide patients' direct feedback on their own health status and treatment effects, which is of great significance for comprehensively assessing care quality.

### Research Methods
The study adopted a cross - sectional survey design, with the subjects being patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes within the last 4 years (n = 392). The study used two validated questionnaires:
- **Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID)**: Used to measure diabetes - related psychological stress.
- **PROMIS - 10**: Used to measure general health status.

In addition, some items determined according to the results of previous qualitative studies were added to cover other aspects considered important by Israeli diabetes patients. Data collection was carried out through telephone interviews and linked to electronic medical records. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the associations between sociodemographic variables and clinical quality indicators and PROMs.

### Main Findings
- **Approximately one - fifth of the participants (22%) had high diabetes - related psychological stress (PAID score ≥ 40)**.
- **Approximately one - third of the participants indicated that they were not confident in managing diabetes, and approximately one - third reported having sexual dysfunction**.
- **Female, younger patients and patients with a lower education level (≤ 12 years) reported poorer general health status, were more likely to experience high diabetes - related psychological stress, and had lower confidence in diabetes self - management**.
- **The performance of all seven diabetes quality indicators was related to poorer general health status and high diabetes - related psychological stress. It is worth noting that there was no significant association between HbA1c, LDL cholesterol or blood pressure levels and PROMs**.

### Conclusions
PROMs provide important information on patients' self - reported health status and can reflect other aspects of care quality that may not be fully captured in traditional clinical indicators. Therefore, the use of PROMs helps to expand the assessment of diabetes care and promote patient - centered care. The researchers suggest that health policy makers and health maintenance organizations implement PROMs to assess and improve the care quality of type 2 diabetes patients.