UK OMFS consultants and trainees strongly support the recommendations of the 2008 Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board (PMETB) Review of Training in OMFS. The time for delivering them is now

Divya Sharma,James Douglas,Anne Begley,Patrick Magennis,David Koppel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.02.009
IF: 2.018
2024-03-02
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Abstract:Introduction When the PMETB Review of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) Training was published in 2008 it contained 5 recommendations about OMFS training. None of these recommendations have yet been delivered. Method An online survey was designed to assess the awareness of the PMETB Review and the current views of OMFS trainees and consultants about the Review's OMFS recommendations. Replies were invited using e-mail and social media (WhatsApp, Twitter and Facebook). As a result of using social media no denominator for the response rate was possible. Results A total of 304 responses were received, 8 of which were anonymous. There was strong support for all the OMFS specific recommendations. 255 (84%) for 1 - OMFS specialty should remain dual medical and dental degree specialty . 283 (93%) for 2 - OMFS training should be shortened ; 203 (67%) for 3 - OMFS training starting at the beginning of the second degree 258 (85%) for 4 - Single medical regulator (General Medical Council) for OMFS ; and 260 (86%) for 6 - Remove need for second Foundation Year . Other suggestions about improving OMFS training were also made by participants in the survey. Conclusion There remains strong support within the specialty of OMFS for the recommendations of the PMETB Review. This support is present across consultants, specialty trainees and those aiming for OMFS specialty training. Some of the original legislative obstructions to delivery of the PMETB recommendations have been removed by Brexit. This creates a unique opportunity for the recommendations to be delivered.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?