Abstract:Abstract Skin cancer incidence is rising annually in the UK, creating a substantial surgical burden. The dermatology training curriculum stipulates the need for regular supervised surgical lists with increasing independence throughout training to help address this growing demand. We distributed an electronic survey to dermatology trainees via the British Association of Dermatologists and British Society for Dermatological Surgery to evaluate current dermatological surgery training in the UK. The survey focused on training experience, satisfaction, and procedural competence to identify areas for improvement. Overall, 79 out of approximately 280 trainees responded (28.2%), of whom 64 (82%) were based in England, 8 in Wales (10%), 5 in Scotland (6%) and 1 in Northern Ireland (1%). Twelve deaneries within England were represented. The majority worked full time (56 trainees; 71%), and 76% of respondents were female. Twelve respondents were CESR trainees (15%) and three were clinical fellows (4%), with the remainder distributed from ST3 to ST6. In total, 59 respondents (76%) had surgical exposure within dermatology or allied surgical specialties before entering the training programme. Fifteen respondents (19%) reported having a supervised surgical list prior to starting training, defined as a consultant, senior dermatologist or equivalent observing their list. Around one-half of trainees (45, 53%) first received surgical supervision during their ST3 year, and 20.3% (16 trainees) had never received direct surgical supervision. Of these respondents, more than one-third (38%, six trainees) were at ST5/ST6 level. Overall, 65% (50 trainees) received intermittent direct supervision during their training, influenced by factors such as departmental staffing and prioritization of service provision; 68% of respondents (54 trainees) reported seeking additional hands-on surgical opportunities to fill gaps in their training. In total, 20% (16 trainees) felt that the procedural curriculum was unachievable within their training programme, and 29% of ST6 trainees (6 of 21) reported an inability to perform excision biopsies on the head and neck unsupervised. Dissatisfaction with surgical training was expressed by 35% (27 trainees). While our response rate limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions, our survey highlights significant intra- and interdeanery disparities in dermatological surgical training. A striking 86% of trainees (68) expressed the need for more consistent supervision to maintain and develop their surgical skills. Trainees call for clearer curricular guidance on surgical exposure and supervision, and national standardization of training to enhance surgical proficiency among the future consultant workforce.

UK OMF surgeons support changes to current specialty recruitment process which could include 'Walport' style local selection and national benchmarking

UK OMFS consultants and trainees strongly support the recommendations of the 2008 Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board (PMETB) Review of Training in OMFS. The time for delivering them is now

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) Consultant Workforce in the UK: reducing consultant numbers resulting from recruitment issues, pension pressures, changing job-plans, and demographics when combined with the COVID backlog in elective surgery, requires urgent action

SP8.8 - Inspiring Overseas Surgeons for a Life in the NHS: Results from an International Cohort

Differential attainment in higher surgical training: scoping pan-specialty spectra

Barriers to Post-CCST training in orthodontics: A survey of trainee perceptions

Recruitment to higher specialty training in anaesthesia in the UK during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a national survey

Relationship between sociodemographic factors and selection into UK postgraduate medical training programmes: a national cohort study

A review of the 'second degree' universities of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) Specialists and Trainees in the UK. Locations of their graduate entry medicine and graduate entry dentistry degrees, graduating between 1979-2019

Factors Affecting Specialty Training Preference Among UK Medical Students (FAST): Protocol for a National Cross-Sectional Survey

Influential Factors in the Selection of Subspecialty Fellowship Training Among Surgical Trainees in Oman

Protocol for the SELECT study: a sequential mixed methods study of the selection of UK medical students into clinical academic training

DiffErential attainment and Factors AssoCiated with Training applications and Outcomes (DE FACTO) study: Trauma & Orthopaedic surgery in the UK

Improving the Training Experience of International Medical Graduates (Imgs): A Survey of Psychiatry Trainees in the Yorkshire & Humber Deanery (West/East/North)

Evaluating neurosurgical training: a national survey examining the British trainee experience

[Recruiting and Personal Development in Surgical Departments of Large Referral Centers - Current Practice and Options for Improvement from Industry and Service Business]

Effect of sex on specialty training application outcomes: a longitudinal administrative data study of UK medical graduates

New UK palliative medicine consultants: clinical and non-clinical preparedness after higher specialty training

How do New Zealand-trained general surgeons secure a SMO job? Are we effectively retaining our trainees?

DS03 Survey of dermatological surgical training in the UK

A cross-sectional survey of doctors' views on flexible postgraduate physician training in Ireland