Abstract:Abstract Background To compare the dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), secondary cancer complication probabilities (SCCP), and excess absolute risk (EAR) differences of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for left-sided breast cancer after mastectomy. Methods and materials Thirty patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) were randomly enrolled in this study. Both IMRT and VMAT treatment plans were created for each patient. Planning target volume (PTV) doses for the chest wall and internal mammary nodes, PTV1, and PTV of the supraclavicular nodes, PTV2, of 50 Gy were prescribed in 25 fractions. The plans were evaluated based on PTV1 and PTV2 coverage, homogeneity index (HI), conformity index, conformity number (CN), dose to organs at risk, NTCP, SCCP, EAR, number of monitors units, and beam delivery time. Results VMAT resulted in more homogeneous chest wall coverage than did IMRT. The percent volume of PTV1 that received the prescribed dose of VMRT and IMRT was 95.9 ± 1.2% and 94.5 ± 1.6%, respectively ( p < 0.001). The HI was 0.11 ± 0.01 for VMAT and 0.12 ± 0.02 for IMRT, respectively ( p = 0.001). The VMAT plan had better conformity (CN: 0.84 ± 0.02 vs. 0.78 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) in PTV compared with IMRT. As opposed to IMRT plans, VMAT delivered a lower mean dose to the ipsilateral lung (11.5 Gy vs 12.6 Gy) and heart (5.2 Gy vs 6.0 Gy) and significantly reduced the V 5 , V 10 , V 20, V 30, and V 40 of the ipsilateral lung and heart; only the differences in V 5 of the ipsilateral lung did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.409). Although the volume of the ipsilateral lung and heart encompassed by the 2.5 Gy isodose line (V 2.5 ) was increased by 6.7% and 7.7% ( p < 0.001, p = 0.002), the NTCP was decreased by 0.8% and 0.6%, and SCCP and EAR were decreased by 1.9% and 0.1% for the ipsilateral lung. No significant differences were observed in the contralateral lung/breast V 2.5 , V 5, V 10 , V 20 , mean dose, SCCP, and EAR. Finally, VMAT reduced the number of monitor units by 31.5% and the treatment time by 71.4%, as compared with IMRT. Conclusions Compared with IMRT, VMAT is the optimal technique for PMRT patients with left-sided breast cancer due to better target coverage, a lower dose delivered, NTCP, SCCP, and EAR to the ipsilateral lung and heart, similar doses delivered to the contralateral lung and breast, fewer monitor units and a shorter delivery time.

Defining a parameter to select the best radiotherapy technique in patients with right breast cancer after conservative surgery: Evaluation of high doses and risk of radio-induced second tumors to the ipsilateral lung

Immobilization-assisted Abdominal Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold in Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy of Left-Sided Breast Cancer with Internal Mammary Chain Coverage

Radiotherapy of prostate cancer: impact of treatment characteristics on the incidence of second tumors

A dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation of VMAT following mastectomy for patients with left-sided breast cancer

Comparison of the Effects of Two Types of Multileaf Collimators on Tumor Control Probability in Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer after Conservative Surgery Based on the EUD Model ⁎

The Therapeutic Value of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy In Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Primary Tumors: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis Based On Propensity Score Matching And Comparison With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Dosimetric Comparison for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy on the Left-Sided Chest Wall and Internal Mammary Nodes Irradiation in Treating Post-Mastectomy Breast Cancer

Postoperative Radiotherapy Using VMAT for RNI Including IMN in Breast Cancer: Report of Short-term Follow-up

Dosimetry of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer and hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Dosimetric Comparison of Hypofractionated Regimen in Breast Cancer Using Two Different Techniques: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)

Evaluation of Hybrid VMAT Advantages and Robustness Considering Setup Errors Using Surface Guided Dose Accumulation for Internal Lymph Mammary Nodes Irradiation of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy

Ultra-Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiotherapy with Automated Hybrid-VMAT Technique: A Pilot Study on Safety, Skin Toxicity and Aesthetic Outcomes

Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Hybrid Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy/Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Right Breast Cancer

Dosimetric Comparison of 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT), Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in Cardiac-Sparing Whole Lung Irradiation

Integral dose comparison of VMAT and IMRT for rectal cancer treatment: A dosimetric analysis

Comprehensive dosimetric planning comparison for early-stage, non-small cell lung cancer with SABR: fixed-beam IMRT versus VMAT versus TomoTherapy

Dosimetric and NTCP advantages of robust proton therapy over robust VMAT for Stage III NSCLC in the immunotherapy era

Effects of Inc parameter on quality of VMAT radiotherapy plans for right breast cancer based on dosimetric study

Volumetric modulated arc therapy total body irradiation improves toxicity outcomes compared to 2D total body irradiation

No differences in radiological changes after 3D conformal vs VMAT-based stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Sparing Organs at Risk with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: an Automatic Treatment Planning Study