Abstract:Background: Restoring maximal muscle strength of the knee extensors (KE) and knee flexors (KF) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction is of great importance to reduce the re-injury rate after ACL reconstruction and to reduce the risk of knee osteoarthritis. Therefore, it is essential that clinicians and healthcare providers use valid and reliable measures to assess knee muscle strength to ensure a safe return to sport. Purpose: To evaluate the reliability (test-retest reliability, inter-tester reliability and test-retest agreement) and validity (concurrent validity, convergent validity and ForceFrame (FF) vs. isokinetic dynamometer (ID) agreement) of the ForceFrame (FF) dynamometer during isometric testing of the knee extensors and flexors. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Material and methods: Twenty-seven participants with ACL injury or reconstruction were recruited for participation in this study. maximal voluntary isometric contration (MVIC) of the knee extensors and flexors was tested on two separate days. Day one included validity assessments with FF, a gold-standard ID and a handheld dynamometer (HHD). Day two included reliability assessments with FF performed by two assessors. Main outcome measures were day-to-day test-retest reliability and agreement and inter-tester reliability of FF, and concurrent validity (FF vs. an ID and a HHD). Reliability was tested as test-retest and inter-tester reliability using interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while agreement was tested using Bland & Altman plots with limits of agreement (LOA), standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Concurrent validity between FF, ID, and HHD was assessed using Pearson's correlations and mean difference was evaluated by Bland & Altman plots. Results: Twenty-seven participants (10 females, 17 males) with a median age of 25 years (range 19-60) were included in this study. There was a good day-to-day test-retest reliability for MVIC of KE (ICC=0.77, CI95:0.48-0.90) and KF (ICC=0.83, CI95:0.61-0.92) and excellent inter-tester reliability for MVIC of KE (ICC=0.97, CI95:0.94-0.98) and KF (ICC=0.93, 95CI:0.85-0.97). Standard error of measurement (SEM) was 8% and 9%, while the smallest detectable change (SDC) was 22% and 27% for KE and KF, respectively. FF showed fair concurrent validity compared to ID for KE (r=0.56), poor concurrent validity for knee flexors (KF (r=0.24) and compared to HHD a moderate correlation for KE (r=0.74) and poor correlation for KF (r=0.12). Bland & Altman plots between FF and the ID showed a mean difference of -0.51 Nm/kg for KE and -0.32Nm/kg for KF. Conclusions: FF can be used to obtain reliable and valid results to assess MVIC of the KE, but not the KF. It should be noted that absolute results produced by the FF may be considered an underestimation of actual MVIC. The test position to assess KF in FF does not appear to be optimal, and different test-positions may be considered. Level of evidence: Level 3.

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of composite finger flexion in patients with traumatic hand injuries: A clinical measurement study

Reliability and sensitivity of an instrument for measuring the midfoot passive mechanical properties

Laboratory-Based Examination of the Reliability and Validity of Kinematic Measures of Wrist and Finger Function Collected by a Telerehabilitation System in Persons with Chronic Stroke

Test-Retest Reliability and Convergent Validity of a Computer Based Hand Function Test Protocol in People with Arthritis

Enhancing the evaluation of physical function following orthopaedic trauma care: comparison of PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Testing and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA)

Validity, Agreement and Reliability of the ForceFrame Dynamometer in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Reliability and usability of a novel inertial sensor-based system to test craniocervical flexion movement control

Quantifying Hand Strength and Isometric Pinch Individuation Using a Flexible Pressure Sensor Grid

Relationship between Passive Stretch Resistance in spastic wrist Flexors and Clinical Scales of Stroke Survivors: A Cross-sectional Study

Concurrent validity of palpation and musculoskeletal ultrasound in evaluating the fascia of individuals with and without myofascial pain syndrome

Clinical evaluation of a wrist sensorimotor rehabilitation program for triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries

Reliability and validity of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in patients with traumatic hand–forearm injuries

Clinical validation of automated depth camera-based measurement of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity

Assessment of alternative techniques to quantify the effect of injury on soft tissue in closed ankle and pilon fractures.

Prospective validation of mean metacarpophalangeal joint extension as a measure of flexor compartment fibrotic inflammation in diabetes-related hand manifestations

Construct validity and responsiveness of the functional Tactile Object Recognition Test for children with cerebral palsy

Personal Motion Sensor Directed Rehabilitation after Lower Limb Reconstruction

A Portable, Neurostimulation-Integrated, Force Measurement Platform for the Clinical Assessment of Plantarflexor Central Drive

Toward a Common Language for Measuring Patient Mobility in the Hospital: Reliability and Construct Validity of Interprofessional Mobility Measures

A Pilot Study of a Finger Kinematic Parameter-Based Tool for Evaluating Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Reliability of an intraoral extension for intraoral palpation and assessment of mechanical sensitivity of the temporal tendon