Abstract:Background: Rehabilitation provided via telehealth offers an alternative to currently limited in-person health care. Effective rehabilitation depends on accurate and relevant assessments that reliably measure changes in function over time. The reliability of a suite of relevant assessments to measure the impact of rehabilitation on physical function is unknown. Objective: We aimed to measure the intrarater reliability of mobility-focused physical outcome measures delivered via Zoom (a commonly used telecommunication platform) and interrater reliability, comparing Zoom with in-person measures. Methods: In this reliability trial, healthy volunteers were recruited to complete 7 mobility-focused outcome measures in view of a laptop, under instructions from a remotely based researcher who undertook the remote evaluations. An in-person researcher (providing the benchmark scores) concurrently recorded their scores. Interrater and intrarater reliability were assessed for Grip Strength, Functional Reach Test, 5-Time Sit to Stand, 3- and 4-Meter Walks and Timed Up and Go, using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. These tests were chosen because they cover a wide array of physical mobility, strength, and balance constructs; require little to no assistance from a clinician; can be performed in the limits of a home environment; and are likely to be feasible over a telehealth delivery mode. Results: A total of 30 participants (mean age 36.2, SD 12.5 years; n=19, 63% male) completed all assessments. Interrater reliability was excellent for Grip Strength (ICC=0.99) and Functional Reach Test (ICC=0.99), good for 5-Time Sit to Stand (ICC=0.842) and 4-Meter Walk (ICC=0.76), moderate for Timed Up and Go (ICC=0.64), and poor for 3-Meter Walk (ICC=–0.46). Intrarater reliability, accessed by the remote researcher, was excellent for Grip Strength (ICC=0.91); good for Timed Up and Go, 3-Meter Walk, 4-Meter Walk, and Functional Reach (ICC=0.84-0.89); and moderate for 5-Time Sit to Stand (ICC=0.67). Although recorded simultaneously, the following time-based assessments were recorded as significantly longer via Zoom: 5-Time Sit to Stand (1.2 seconds), Timed Up and Go (1.0 seconds), and 3-Meter Walk (1.3 seconds). Conclusions: Untimed mobility-focused physical outcome measures have excellent interrater reliability between in-person and telehealth measurements. Timed outcome measures took approximately 1 second longer via Zoom, reducing the reliability of tests with a shorter duration. Small time differences favoring in-person attendance are of a similar magnitude to clinically important differences, indicating assessments undertaken using telecommunications technology (Zoom) cannot be compared directly with face-to-face delivery. This has implications for clinicians using blended (ie, some face-to-face and some via the internet) assessments. High intrarater reliability of mobility-focused physical outcome measures has been demonstrated in this study.

Toward a Common Language for Measuring Patient Mobility in the Hospital: Reliability and Construct Validity of Interprofessional Mobility Measures

Standardizing Identification of Cognitive Impairment in the Acute Hospital Setting: Toward a Common Language

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Physical Therapy Functional Measurement Tool--the Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale--in Acute Hospital Inpatients

Exploring the relationship between AM‐PAC scores and mobility components in falls and pressure injury risk assessment tools: A pathway to improve nursing clinical efficiency

Perceived Barriers to Mobility in a Medical ICU: The Patient Mobilization Attitudes & Beliefs Survey for the ICU

Mobility-Focused Physical Outcome Measures Over Telecommunication Technology (Zoom): Intra and Interrater Reliability Trial

A novel early mobility bundle improves length of stay and rates of readmission among hospitalized general medicine patients

Reliability and concurrent validity of the Active Movement Scale (AMS) in adults with musculoskeletal disorders

Are your patients safe to mobilize alone in their room? The Johns Hopkins Hospital In-Room Independence Scale (JH-IRIS)

Mobility level and factors affecting mobility status in hospitalized patients admitted in single-occupancy patient rooms

Development and inter-rater reliability of a simple prehospital mobility score for use in emergency patients

Written Mobility Communication in Acute Care Medical Wards: An Observational Study of Physical Therapists' and Nurses' Documentation Practice

Development and Validation of a Video-Animated Tool for Assessing Mobility

Laboratory-Based Examination of the Reliability and Validity of Kinematic Measures of Wrist and Finger Function Collected by a Telerehabilitation System in Persons with Chronic Stroke

Parallel-forms Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of the Four Telerehabilitation Version Mobility-related Function Scales in Stroke Survivors

Implementation of an Interprofessional Mobility Program in a Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Inertial Measurement Units to Measure Three-Dimensional Spine and Hip Kinematics during Clinical Movement Tasks

Theory-driven assessment of intentions and behaviours related to mobility of older inpatients: a survey of patients and healthcare professionals

Measures of perceived mobility ability in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of psychometric properties

Fidelity, acceptability, and feasibility of the revised functional autonomy measurement system for hospitalised people: An implementation study

Test-retest reliability of three life balance measures in people with neuromuscular disease: the activity card sort-NL, the activity calculator, and the occupational balance questionnaire