Walter Bagehot and Lombard Street (1873): introduction to a 150-year retrospective
Sandrine Leloup,Hans-Michael Trautwein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2024.2411893
2024-10-12
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Abstract:This special issue contains a selection of papers presented at the conference Walter Bagehot and Lombard Street (1873): A 150-Year Retrospective , which took place at the Université Bretagne Sud in Vannes, Brittany on 29 and 30 June 2023. Organising a conference on Bagehot may seem surprising to economists: Bagehot is mainly known as an essayist and journalist. He has been criticised for his provocative and casual style and is not widely recognised as an economist. Nevertheless, it was him who made The Economist , of which he was editor-in-chief from 1861 unto his death in 1877, a reference journal for the City of London, the world's financial centre at the time. Bagehot's collected works, republished by Norman St. John-Stevas (London: The Economist, 1965–86), comprise fifteen volumes, three of which contain his economic essays. Lombard Street is certainly the best-known economic essay, but there are also the unfinished volumes of Economic Studies (1880) and pamphlets such as Universal Money (1869), based on articles from The Economist . Among economists, opinions on Bagehot's qualifications as an economist were mixed. Keynes ( Citation 1915 , 369) observed that Bagehot's contributions to economics "are generally acknowledged to be of the highest degree of excellence. And yet in some respects it would be just to say that he was not an economist at all." A few lines further down, Keynes described Bagehot as "a psychologist - a psychological analyser, not of the great or of genius, but of those of a middle position, and primarily of businessmen, financiers, and politicians." Later, Kindleberger ( Citation 1980 , 121) paid a qualified tribute to Bagehot by praising him as "a fine economist, but the pleasure of these volumes lies largely in how he says it, rather than in what he says".
economics,history of social sciences