Bagehot's classical money view: a reconstruction

Perry Mehrling
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2024.2329050
2024-04-13
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Abstract:Bagehot is difficult for modern economists to read with understanding, for three reasons. He was a classical economist not neoclassical, his orientation was global not national, and most importantly his intellectual formation was as a practicing country banker not an academic. This paper adopts all three perspectives, and uses this frame to reinterpret his mature work, both Lombard Street and the unfinished Economic Studies , as the origin of the key currency tradition which continues as a minority view in modern economics.
economics,history of social sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?