Abstract:From 1975 onwards, the American Keynesian monetary economist James Tobin changed his interpretation of the Keynesian case that active stabilisation policy is sometimes needed to restore full employment, offering a new interpretation that drew on Keynes's General Theory (Chapter 19) and on Irving Fisher's 1933 debt-deflation theory of depressions to argue that wage and price flexibility could be destabilizing. Tobin's very first journal article in 1941 attributed the existence of involuntary unemployment in a Keynesian economy to money wage rigidity and money illusion, as he also did in 1947. From 1975 onwards, Tobin responded to New Classical critiques of Keynesianism by absolving Keynes from assumptions of irrational money illusion or unexplained wage rigidity, arguing instead that Keynes assumed a given money wage in the first eighteen chapters of his General Theory for simplicity of exposition and as a policy recommendation. Like Hyman Minsky and Peter Howitt, Tobin stressed the previously underappreciated Chapter 19 of The General Theory , where Keynes argued that faster adjustment of prices and money wages could be destabilising. The basis of Keynesian macroeconomics was coordination failure and instability, not irrational money illusion or an arbitrary assumption of a fixed money wage. The most important aspect of this discussion of debt-deflation and of macroeconomic instability and coordination failure came through the attention to Keynes's Chapter 19, Fisher, Minsky, and Tobin in Ben Bernanke's dissertation on the breakdown of financial intermediation in the US culminating in the 1933 Bank Holiday and in Mervyn King's 1994 European Economic Association presidential address on debt-deflation. This intellectual preparation shaped the response of Bernanke and King to the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2009, when they placed absolute priority on preventing a debt-deflation spiral that would take the economy out of its corridor of stability. Presented to the Nice workshop on "Coordination Issues in Historical Perspective," September 9, 2022. We are grateful for helpful comments from Peter Howitt, Goulven Rubin and other participants there and at a workshop in memory of Jerome de Boyer des Roches at the University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne in June 2022 and from two anonymous referees.

Bagehot and the stabilising function of central banks

Bagehot's classical money view: a reconstruction

Tell me the truth about Bagehot: lender of last resort in Historical perspective

Walter Bagehot and Lombard Street (1873): introduction to a 150-year retrospective

Walter Bagehot, creator of the modern Treasury bill (1877)

Abundance and scarcity : classical theories of money, bank balance sheets and business models, and the British restriction of 1797-1818

Classical Political Economy and the Evolution of Central Banks: Endogenous Money and the Fiscal-Military State

Threadneedle: An Experimental Tool for the Simulation and Analysis of Fractional Reserve Banking Systems

Bagehot's giant bubble failure

Reappraising Walter Bagehot's Liberalism: Discussion, Public Opinion, and the Meaning of Parliamentary Government

James Tobin on macroeconomic instability: an old Keynesian changes ground

MONEY AND BANKING IN SEARCH EQUILIBRIUM*

The Bank of England and conservative sound money politics: economic ideas in a contested political sphere

Historicizing the money of account: a critique of the nominalist ontology of money

The Broad Consequences Of Narrow Banking

Goodhart, Charles A.E. and Tsomocos, Dimitros P.: The challenge of financial stability: a new model and its applications

The Two Approaches to Money: Debt, Central Banks, and Functional Finance

Money, Banking, and Monetary Policy

Stochastic Equilibrium the Lucas Critique and Keynesian Economics

Smoke On The Water: Hes At 50 And The Non-Neutrality Of History

Speaking to the people? Money, trust, and central bank legitimacy in the age of quantitative easing