Analysis of Graft Detachments and Re-Bubblings After 450 Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Procedures

Louise Massia Menkene,Tim Berger,Tarek Safi,Loïc Hamon,Cristian Munteanu,Berthold Seitz,Loay Daas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000003531
IF: 3.152
2024-03-27
Cornea
Abstract:Purpose: To objectify the indication for re-bubbling by analyzing graft detachments (GDs) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Methods: In this retrospective monocentric observational study, re-bubbling cases of 450 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasties and the percentage of the residual gas filling (RGF) in the anterior chamber on the first postoperative day were collected. The number/location/extent of GDs and the corneal thickness above GDs were analyzed using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Results: From a total of 450 grafts, 384 (85.3%) had at least a minimal degree GD. One hundred twenty-two of 450 grafts (27.1%) underwent at least 1 re-bubbling. The mean RGF was significantly lower in eyes with GD (67.7 ± 12.6%) than in eyes without GD (74.2 ± 11.3%). GDs occurred most frequently in the inferotemporal quadrant (46.0%). GDs were significantly more likely to require a re-bubbling when the central parts of the graft were affected (94.0% vs. 35.7%). The number of detachments per graft was directly proportional to the re-bubbling rate. The GDs which required a re-bubbling were on average 56 μm higher and 461 μm wider than the untreated ones. The cornea above the GDs that needed a re-bubbling was significantly thicker than above the untreated GDs (mean 988 ± 102 μm vs. 951 ± 99 μm). Conclusions: The RGF seems to be a major influencing factor for graft attachment. The most susceptible location of the GD is inferotemporal. The main factors that need to be investigated to decide if a re-bubbling is required are the number of detachments per graft, their dimensions, whether the central portions of the graft are involved, and the corneal thickness above GDs.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?