Clarifying the Relationship Between Chemical States of P in Fe–P alloys and Pitting Corrosion Resistance

Riku Takayama,Masashi Nishimoto,Haruka Sato,Izumi Muto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ad8269

IF: 3.9

2024-10-03

Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract:Fe–0.002P, Fe–0.05P, Fe–0.2P, and Fe–2P alloys (numbers indicate the mass%) were fabricated, and their pitting potentials, depassivation pH values, and active dissolution rates were measured. The order of pitting potentials was (high) Fe–0.002P ≥ Fe–0.05P ≥ Fe–0.2P >> Fe–2P (low), and that of depassivation pH values was (low) Fe–0.002P ≤ Fe–0.05P ≤ Fe–0.2P << Fe–2P (high). Both parameters changed significantly between the Fe–0.2P and Fe–2P alloys. No evidence of grain boundary segregation of P was observed in the Fe–0.05P alloy. In the Fe–0.2P alloy, grain boundary segregation of P was observed, but no pitting occurred at the grain boundaries. In the Fe–2P alloy, Fe3P precipitated at the grain boundaries and in grains, but pitting corrosion occurred in the alloy matrix and not in Fe3P. This indicated that P in the solid solution was the main cause of the decrease in pitting corrosion resistance. The P concentration in the surface oxide film on Fe–2P was higher than that on Fe–0.2P, and the P in the films was determined to be FePO4. The decrease in the pitting resistance with an increasing P concentration was due to FePO4.

electrochemistry,materials science, coatings & films