Abstract:Diffusion MR images are prone to severe geometric distortions induced by head movement, eddy-current and inhomogeneity of magnetic susceptibility. Various correction methods have been proposed that depend on the choice of the acquisition settings and potentially provide highly different data quality. However, the impact of this choice has not been evaluated in terms of the ratio between scan time and preprocessed data quality. This study aims at investigating the impact of six well-known preprocessing methods, each associated to specific acquisition settings, on the outcome of diffusion analyses. For this purpose, we developed a comprehensive toolbox called <i>Diffuse</i> which automatically guides the user to the best preprocessing pipeline according to the input data. Using MR images of 20 subjects from the HCP dataset, we compared the six pre-processing pipelines regarding the following criteria: the ability to recover brain's true geometry, the tensor model estimation and derived indices in the white matter, and finally the spatial dispersion of six well known connectivity pathways. As expected the pipeline associated to the longer acquisition fully repeated with reversed phase-encoding (RPE) yielded the higher data quality and was used as a reference to evaluate the other pipelines. In this way, we highlighted several significant aspects of other pre-processing pipelines. Our results first established that eddy-current correction improves the tensor-fitting performance with a localized impact especially in the corpus callosum. Concerning susceptibility distortions, we showed that the use of a field map is not sufficient and involves additional smoothing, yielding to an artificial decrease of tensor-fitting error. Of most importance, our findings demonstrate that, for an equivalent scan time, the acquisition of a b0 volume with RPE ensures a better brain's geometry reconstruction and local improvement of tensor quality, without any smoothing of the image. This was found to be the best scan time/data quality compromise. To conclude, this study highlights and attempts to quantify the strong dependence of diffusion metrics on acquisition settings and preprocessing methods.

“MASSIVE” brain dataset: Multiple acquisitions for standardization of structural imaging validation and evaluation

An open relaxation-diffusion MRI dataset in neurosurgical studies

In vivo disentanglement of diffusion frequency‐dependence, tensor shape, and relaxation using multidimensional MRI

Harmonized diffusion MRI data and white matter measures from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study

Submillimeter diffusion MRI using an in-plane segmented 3D multi-slab acquisition and denoiser-regularized reconstruction

Diff5T: Benchmarking Human Brain Diffusion MRI with an Extensive 5.0 Tesla K-Space and Spatial Dataset

ACID: A Comprehensive Toolbox for Image Processing and Modeling of Brain, Spinal Cord, and Post-mortem Diffusion MRI Data

Reproducibility of the Standard Model of diffusion in white matter on clinical MRI systems

7 Tesla MRI of the ex vivo human brain at 100 micron resolution

Multi-Site Harmonization of Diffusion MRI Data Via Method of Moments

An MRI Deep Brain Adult Template With An Advanced Atlas-Based Tool For Diffusion Tensor Imaging Analysis

Ultra-high field (10.5T) diffusion-weighted MRI of the macaque brain

Connectomes, simultaneous EEG-fMRI resting-state data and brain simulation results from 50 healthy subjects

Diffusion Mri Simulation For Human Brain Based On The Atlas

Deep Learning Accelerated Brain Diffusion-Weighted MRI with Super Resolution Processing

A high-resolution 7 Tesla resting-state fMRI dataset optimized for studying the subcortex

High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging with interleaved variable-density spiral acquisitions

Diffusion MRI: Assessment of the Impact of Acquisition and Preprocessing Methods Using the BrainVISA-Diffuse Toolbox

Surface-based parcellation and vertex-wise analysis of ultra high-resolution ex vivo 7 tesla MRI in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias

Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study Group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 3 -- Ex vivo imaging: data processing, comparisons with microscopy, and tractography

A paired dataset of T1- and T2-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla