Quantitative EEG for the Monitoring of Walking Recovery in Chronic Stroke Patients Receiving Action Observation Training

Fatemeh Shamsi,Hadi Aligholi,Mohammad Taghi Karimi,Afshin Borhani-Haghighi,Mohammad Nami,Fatemeh ShamsiHadi AligholiMohammad Taghi KarimiAfshin Borhani-HaghighiMohammad Nami1 Department of Neuroscience,School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies,Shiraz University of Medical Sciences,Shiraz,Iran.2 Neuroscience Laboratory (Brain,Cognition and Behavior),Department of Neuroscience,School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies,Shiraz University of Medical Sciences,Shiraz,Iran.3 Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center,Shiraz University of Medical Sciences,Shiraz,Iran.4 Clinical Neurology Research Center,Shiraz University of Medical Sciences,Shiraz,Iran.5 Neuroscience Center,Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas Servicios de Alta Tecnología (INDICASAT AIP),City of Knowledge,Panama City,Panama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2024.2320904
2024-02-28
Journal of Motor Behavior
Abstract:The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of action observation on the walking ability and oscillatory brain activity of chronic stroke patients. Fourteen chronic stroke patients were allocated randomly to the action observation (AO) or sham observation (SO) groups. Both groups received 12 sessions of intervention. Each session composed of 12 min of observational training, which depicted exercises for the experimental group but nature pictures for the sham group and 40 min of occupational therapy, which was the same for the both groups. Walking ability was assessed by a motion analysis system and brain activity was monitored using quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) before and after the intervention. Brain asymmetry at alpha frequency, the percentage of stance phase, and step length showed significant changes in the AO group. Only the change in global alpha power was significantly correlated with the change in velocity after the intervention in AO group. Despite more improvements in walking and brain activity of patients in the AO group, our study failed to show significant correlations between the brain activity changes and functional improvements after the intervention, which might be mainly due to the small sample size in our study. Trial registration: IRCT20181014041333N1.
psychology, experimental,neurosciences,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?