Application of a Brain–Computer Interface System with Visual and Motor Feedback in Limb and Brain Functional Rehabilitation after Stroke: Case Report
Wen Gao,Zhengzhe Cui,Yang Yu,Jing Mao,Jun Xu,Leilei Ji,Xiuli Kan,Xianshan Shen,Xueming Li,Shiqiang Zhu,Yongfeng Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081083
IF: 3.333
2022-01-01
Brain Sciences
Abstract:(1) Objective: To investigate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a brain–computer interface (BCI) system with visual and motor feedback in limb and brain function rehabilitation after stroke. (2) Methods: First, we recruited three hemiplegic stroke patients to perform rehabilitation training using a BCI system with visual and motor feedback for two consecutive days (four sessions) to verify the feasibility and safety of the system. Then, we recruited five other hemiplegic stroke patients for rehabilitation training (6 days a week, lasting for 12–14 days) using the same BCI system to verify the effectiveness. The mean and Cohen’s w were used to compare the changes in limb motor and brain functions before and after training. (3) Results: In the feasibility verification, the continuous motor state switching time (CMSST) of the three patients was 17.8 ± 21.0s, and the motor state percentages (MSPs) in the upper and lower limb training were 52.6 ± 25.7% and 72.4 ± 24.0%, respectively. The effective training revolutions (ETRs) per minute were 25.8 ± 13.0 for upper limb and 24.8 ± 6.4 for lower limb. There were no adverse events during the training process. Compared with the baseline, the motor function indices of the five patients were improved, including sitting balance ability, upper limb Fugel–Meyer assessment (FMA), lower limb FMA, 6 min walking distance, modified Barthel index, and root mean square (RMS) value of triceps surae, which increased by 0.4, 8.0, 5.4, 11.4, 7.0, and 0.9, respectively, and all had large effect sizes (Cohen’s w ≥ 0.5). The brain function indices of the five patients, including the amplitudes of the motor evoked potentials (MEP) on the non-lesion side and lesion side, increased by 3.6 and 3.7, respectively; the latency of MEP on the non-lesion side was shortened by 2.6 ms, and all had large effect sizes (Cohen’s w ≥ 0.5). (4) Conclusions: The BCI system with visual and motor feedback is applicable in active rehabilitation training of stroke patients with hemiplegia, and the pilot results show potential multidimensional benefits after a short course of treatment.