Abstract:Increasing urbanization coupled with spatial expansion and numerical increase of New World vulture populations has engendered a rise in human-vulture conflict, creating a need for effective tools to mitigate vulture-related damage. Visual frightening devices that mimic the presence of human or other predators can be employed in human-vulture conflict scenarios to increase perceived risk by the pest species, thereby eliciting an antipredator behavioral response, such as fleeing. One visual frightening device, inflatable scarecrows, recently proved effective at reducing passerine attendance at feral swine feeders, but their effectiveness when directed at other species and conflict scenarios has varied. Our primary objective was to evaluate an inflatable deterrent for reducing the number of black ( Coragyps atratus ) and turkey vultures ( Cathartes aura ) present (hereafter abundance) at 13 human-vulture conflict sites throughout the southeastern United States. We predicted that vulture abundance would be substantially reduced when inflatable deterrents were deployed. Because we suspected other factors might also influence vulture site abundance, we also examined the exploratory variables of weather, site size (area), and vulture tolerance to human approach in relation to vulture site abundance using a model selection approach. Black vulture site abundance was more pervasive than turkey vultures, occurring at all sites and accounting for 85% of daily vulture counts (10.78 ± 0.52 vultures/site/day) whereas turkey vultures were only present at 62% of sites (2.12 ± 0.21). Across all sites, inflatable scarecrows were effective at reducing vulture abundance by 82% during the seventeen-day treatment period when deterrents were deployed (3.50 ± 0.20), but only a 48% reduction during the twenty-one-day post-treatment phase (15.34 ± 1.39) was observed. Site size and weather did not influence tool effectiveness. Human tolerance at sites, as determined by vulture flight initiation distance, was influential, with tool effectiveness being reduced at sites where local human tolerance was high. We recommend inflatable scarecrows as a tool to reduce vulture-wildlife conflict to private property and recreation at sites where the conflict is spatially restricted (e.g., parking lot or recreation area), conducive to scarecrow deployment (e.g., flat stable surfaces), and where vulture site human tolerance is low to moderate.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to effectively reduce the conflicts between New World vultures (black vultures and turkey vultures) and humans. With the acceleration of the urbanization process, as well as the increase in the population and the expansion of the distribution range of New World vultures, these birds pose more and more threats to human property, health and safety. Specifically, these conflicts include: 1. **Damage to residential and commercial property**: For example, vultures can damage synthetic materials such as roof coverings, plastic seat covers and windshield wipers. 2. **Livestock predation**: In particular, black vultures can pose a threat to livestock. 3. **Health and safety risks**: Such as the spread of diseases through feces and the risk of collision with aircraft. To address these problems, researchers tested a new type of visual deterrent tool - inflatable scarecrows, to evaluate its effectiveness in reducing the number of vulture aggregations. The main objective of the study was to determine whether this inflatable deterrent device could significantly reduce the number of vultures at conflict sites and to explore the influence of other factors (such as weather, site size and vultures' tolerance to human approach) on this effect. ### Research Background In recent years, the populations of black vultures (*Coragyps atratus*) and turkey vultures (*Cathartes aura*) in North America have increased, and their distribution ranges have expanded, resulting in more human - vulture conflicts. These conflicts mainly occur in the eastern and southern United States, especially in places where vultures perch, rest or forage. Due to the economic losses caused by these conflicts, researchers and wildlife managers have been looking for effective mitigation measures. Traditional deterrence methods include the use of lasers, vulture models, motion - activated sprinklers and other inflatable devices, but the effectiveness of these methods varies by species and location. ### Research Methods The study selected 13 different types of vulture - human conflict sites in the southeastern United States for experiments, and these sites were distributed in five states. The experiment was divided into three phases: - **Pre - treatment phase**: The inflatable deterrent device was not activated, and the baseline situation was observed. - **Treatment phase**: The inflatable deterrent device was activated to evaluate its immediate effect. - **Post - treatment phase**: The use of the inflatable deterrent device was stopped again, and the recovery situation was observed. ### Main Findings 1. **Overall effect**: The inflatable deterrent device significantly reduced the number of vultures during the treatment phase, with an average reduction of 82%. 2. **Distance effect**: The inflatable deterrent device was effective within a range of 50 meters, and its effect weakened beyond 50 meters. 3. **Influence of human tolerance**: At sites with low and medium human tolerance, the inflatable deterrent device was more effective, reducing the number of vultures by 86% and 98% respectively; while at sites with high human tolerance, the effect was poorer, with only a 55.10% reduction. 4. **Long - term effect**: During the post - treatment phase, the number of vultures rebounded, but it was still 48% lower than that in the pre - treatment phase. ### Conclusions The research results show that the inflatable deterrent device is an effective short - term solution and can significantly reduce the number of vultures at specific sites, especially in places with low human tolerance. However, the long - term effect and habituation issues still need further research. It is recommended to use this tool in areas with limited space and where vultures are more sensitive to human activities. ### Formula Summary No complex mathematical formulas were involved in this paper, but the following non - parametric test methods were used in the statistical analysis part: - Kruskal - Wallis test was used to compare the effects of different treatment phases and distances on the number of vultures. - Wilcoxon rank - sum test was used to evaluate the change in the number of vultures before and after treatment. ```markdown Kruskal - Wallis χ² = 272.69, p < 0.001 ``` These statistical methods ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results.

Efficacy of an inflatable deterrent for reducing New World vulture human-wildlife conflict

The fox in the box: acoustic deterrent and simulated predator disturbance to reduce problematic bird accumulations

Using animal tracking for early detection of mass poisoning events

The spatiotemporal properties of artificial feeding schemes influence the post-fledging movement of Egyptian Vultures

Bear deterrence with scare devices, a non‐lethal tool in the use‐of‐force continuum

Taphonomic signatures of early scavenging by black and turkey vultures

Deterrence of birds with an artificial predator, the RobotFalcon

Predicted short‐term mesoscavenger release gives way to apex‐scavenger dominance

Characterising ecological resource utilization by the Endangered Egyptian vulture in Oman to better manage and mitigate electrocution risk

Vultures and Livestock: The Where, When, and Why of Visits to Farms

Empirical and simulation data reveal a lack of avoidance of wind turbines by Gyps fulvus (Griffon Vulture)

Drone‐mounted audio‐visual deterrence of bats: implications for reducing aerial wildlife mortality by wind turbines

Long-term demographic dynamics of a keystone scavenger disrupted by human-induced shifts in food availability

Death detector: Using vultures as sentinels to detect carcasses by combining bio‐logging and machine learning

Evaluating drones as bird deterrents in industrial environments: multirotor vs fixed-wing efficacy

Integrating threat mapping and animal movement data to identify high‐risk areas for endangered mobile species

Thermal aerial culling for the control of vertebrate pest populations

Interactions between eagles and semidomestic reindeer: lessons learned from field surveys and deterrents

Vultures acquire information on carcass location from scavenging eagles

Effective range of auditory frightening devices based on hearing capabilities and antipredator responses of nuisance blackbirds

Evaluating diversionary feeding as a method to resolve conservation conflicts in a recovering ecosystem