Abstract:Bears foraging near human developments are often presumed to be responding to food shortage, but this explanation ignores social factors, in particular despotism in bears. We analyzed the age distribution and body condition index (BCI) of shot brown bears in relation to densities of bears and people, and whether the shot bears were killed by managers (i.e., problem bears; n = 149), in self-defense (n = 51), or were hunter-killed nonproblem bears (n = 1,896) during 1990-2010. We compared patterns between areas with (Slovenia) and without supplemental feeding (Sweden) of bears relative to 2 hypotheses. The food-search/food-competition hypothesis predicts that problem bears should have a higher BCI (e.g., exploiting easily accessible and/or nutritious human-derived foods) or lower BCI (e.g., because of food shortage) than nonproblem bears, that BCI and human density should have a positive correlation, and problem bear occurrence and seasonal mean BCI of nonproblem bears should have a negative correlation (i.e., more problem bears during years of low food availability). Food competition among bears additionally predicts an inverse relationship between BCI and bear density. The safety-search/naivety hypothesis (i.e., avoiding other bears or lack of human experience) predicts no relationship between BCI and human density, provided no dietary differences due to spatiotemporal habitat use among bears, no relationship between problem bear occurrence and seasonal mean BCI of nonproblem bears, and does not necessarily predict a difference between BCI for problem/nonproblem bears. If food competition or predation avoidance explained bear occurrence near settlements, we predicted younger problem than nonproblem bears and a negative correlation between age and human density. However, if only food search explained bear occurrence near settlements, we predicted no relation between age and problem or nonproblem bear status, or between age and human density. We found no difference in BCI or its variability between problem and nonproblem bears, no relation between BCI and human density, and no correlation between numbers of problem bears shot and seasonal mean BCI for either country. The peak of shot problem bears occurred from April to June in Slovenia and in June in Sweden (i.e., during the mating period when most intraspecific predation occurs and before fall hyperphagia). Problem bears were younger than nonproblem bears, and both problem and nonproblem bears were younger in areas of higher human density. These age differences, in combination with similarities in BCI between problem and nonproblem bears and lack of correlation between BCI and human density, suggested safety-search and naïve dispersal to be the primary mechanisms responsible for bear occurrence near settlements. Younger bears are less competitive, more vulnerable to intraspecific predation, and lack human experience, compared to adults. Body condition was inversely related to the bear density index in Sweden, whereas we found no correlation in Slovenia, suggesting that supplemental feeding may have reduced food competition, in combination with high bear harvest rates. Bears shot in self-defense were older and their BCI did not differ from that of nonproblem bears. Reasons other than food shortage apparently explained why most bears were involved in encounters with people or viewed as problematic near settlements in our study.

Bear deterrence with scare devices, a non‐lethal tool in the use‐of‐force continuum

Can an old dog learn a new trick? : Efficacy of livestock guardian dogs at keeping an apex predator away from people

Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict

Non‐lethal control of wildlife: using chemical repellents as feeding deterrents for the European badger Meles meles

The potential of electrified barriers to keep black bears out of fenced road corridors at low volume access roads

Non-lethal defense of livestock against predators: flashing lights deter puma attacks in Chile

The fox in the box: acoustic deterrent and simulated predator disturbance to reduce problematic bird accumulations

Ecology of fear alters behavior of grizzly bears exposed to bear‐viewing ecotourism

Population reduction by hunting helps control human-wildlife conflicts for a species that is a conservation success story

Does despotic behavior or food search explain the occurrence of problem brown bears in Europe?

Mitigation Strategies for Human-Tibetan Brown Bear (Ursus arctos pruinosus) Conflicts in the Hinterland of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Resolving human‐bear conflict: A global survey of countries, experts, and key factors

Influence of ecotourism on grizzly bear activity depends on salmon abundance in the Atnarko River corridor, Nuxalk Territory

Deer damage: A review of repellents to reduce impacts worldwide

Effects of environmental conditions on the use of forward‐looking infrared for bear den detection in the Alaska Arctic

Effective range of auditory frightening devices based on hearing capabilities and antipredator responses of nuisance blackbirds

Reducing risky interactions: Identifying barriers to the successful management of human–wildlife conflict in an urban parkland

Dead or alive? Comparing costs and benefits of lethal and non-lethal human–wildlife conflict mitigation on livestock farms

Human disturbance in riparian areas disrupts predator–prey interactions between grizzly bears and salmon

Large Omnivore Movements in Response to Surface Mining and Mine Reclamation

Are super-predators also super-scary? A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal responses to human interactions