Abstract:Bears foraging near human developments are often presumed to be responding to food shortage, but this explanation ignores social factors, in particular despotism in bears. We analyzed the age distribution and body condition index (BCI) of shot brown bears in relation to densities of bears and people, and whether the shot bears were killed by managers (i.e., problem bears; n = 149), in self-defense (n = 51), or were hunter-killed nonproblem bears (n = 1,896) during 1990-2010. We compared patterns between areas with (Slovenia) and without supplemental feeding (Sweden) of bears relative to 2 hypotheses. The food-search/food-competition hypothesis predicts that problem bears should have a higher BCI (e.g., exploiting easily accessible and/or nutritious human-derived foods) or lower BCI (e.g., because of food shortage) than nonproblem bears, that BCI and human density should have a positive correlation, and problem bear occurrence and seasonal mean BCI of nonproblem bears should have a negative correlation (i.e., more problem bears during years of low food availability). Food competition among bears additionally predicts an inverse relationship between BCI and bear density. The safety-search/naivety hypothesis (i.e., avoiding other bears or lack of human experience) predicts no relationship between BCI and human density, provided no dietary differences due to spatiotemporal habitat use among bears, no relationship between problem bear occurrence and seasonal mean BCI of nonproblem bears, and does not necessarily predict a difference between BCI for problem/nonproblem bears. If food competition or predation avoidance explained bear occurrence near settlements, we predicted younger problem than nonproblem bears and a negative correlation between age and human density. However, if only food search explained bear occurrence near settlements, we predicted no relation between age and problem or nonproblem bear status, or between age and human density. We found no difference in BCI or its variability between problem and nonproblem bears, no relation between BCI and human density, and no correlation between numbers of problem bears shot and seasonal mean BCI for either country. The peak of shot problem bears occurred from April to June in Slovenia and in June in Sweden (i.e., during the mating period when most intraspecific predation occurs and before fall hyperphagia). Problem bears were younger than nonproblem bears, and both problem and nonproblem bears were younger in areas of higher human density. These age differences, in combination with similarities in BCI between problem and nonproblem bears and lack of correlation between BCI and human density, suggested safety-search and naïve dispersal to be the primary mechanisms responsible for bear occurrence near settlements. Younger bears are less competitive, more vulnerable to intraspecific predation, and lack human experience, compared to adults. Body condition was inversely related to the bear density index in Sweden, whereas we found no correlation in Slovenia, suggesting that supplemental feeding may have reduced food competition, in combination with high bear harvest rates. Bears shot in self-defense were older and their BCI did not differ from that of nonproblem bears. Reasons other than food shortage apparently explained why most bears were involved in encounters with people or viewed as problematic near settlements in our study.

No evidence hunting bait increases American black bear population growth in Maine, USA

Population reduction by hunting helps control human-wildlife conflicts for a species that is a conservation success story

Predictors of female American black bear body mass in an anthropogenic landscape

Assimilated Diet Patterns of American Black Bears in the Sierra Nevada and Western Great Basin, Nevada, USA

Age-at-harvest models as monitoring and harvest management tools for Wisconsin carnivores

Presence of trailers reduces culvert‐style trap success in American black bears (Ursus americanus)

Spring black bear harvest and predation pressure on moose calves in a multi‐predator system

Does despotic behavior or food search explain the occurrence of problem brown bears in Europe?

Estimation of black bear abundance by management zone in Wisconsin

Temporal effects of hunting on foraging behavior of an apex predator: Do bears forego foraging when risk is high?

Background food influences rate of encounter and efficacy of rodenticides in wild house mice

Influence of ecotourism on grizzly bear activity depends on salmon abundance in the Atnarko River corridor, Nuxalk Territory

Evidence for density-dependent effects on body composition of a large omnivore in a changing Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

Using public-sourced photos to track changes in moose antler size during a 20-year hunting ban

Long-term use of non-invasive sampling methods: does successful sampling of brown bears by hair snares and camera traps change over time?

Female black bear home range and resource selection in relation to West Virginia mine lands

Behavioural responses of brown bears to roads and hunting disturbance

Beware of Bear? Long-Term Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Human–Bear Conflict in Connecticut

Bears and berries: species-specific selective foraging on a patchily distributed food resource in a human-altered landscape

Consequences of severe habitat fragmentation on density, genetics, and spatial capture-recapture analysis of a small bear population

Dietary plasticity and the importance of salmon to brown bear (Ursus arctos) body size and condition in a low Arctic ecosystem