Abstract:Habitat alteration is causing woodland caribou populations to decline owing to increased predation by wolves, which benefit from the increased abundance of their primary prey, moose. Management strategies, including reducing wolf populations and increasing moose hunting opportunities enough to sufficiently affect wolf populations, have shown potential to meet short‐term caribou conservation objectives. This study suggests that without moose reductions, more wolves will need to be removed to meet caribou conservation targets. Woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) are declining across much of their distribution in Canada in response to habitat alteration, leading to unsustainable predation, particularly by wolves (Canis lupus). Habitat alteration can benefit the primary prey species of wolves (moose [Alces alces] and deer [Odocoileus spp.]) by creating early seral conditions that contain more of their preferred food types. This increase in primary prey populations results in elevated wolf abundance and heightened predation pressure on caribou. In response to the elevated wolf populations and the risks to caribou, managers have reduced wolf abundance in key areas. Ecological theory suggests that reducing wolf abundance would release moose from the top‐down effects of wolf predation, potentially allowing moose populations to grow. Elevated moose abundance thus has the potential to cause wolf populations to rebound quickly each year following reductions, suggesting a possible link between moose abundance and the number of wolves killed for caribou conservation. To test this idea we used a unique management situation in British Columbia and Alberta, Canada, where lethal wolf removals were annually conducted across specific southern mountain caribou population ranges and, in some places, moose populations were concurrently reduced via liberalized hunting. We used indices of moose abundance and wolf removal data to test the hypothesis that reducing moose populations to a historical abundance target by hunting leads to fewer wolves killed for caribou conservation. After controlling for habitat quality, wolves removed per km2 was 3.2 times lower in areas with reduced moose density ( x ̄ = 1.55 wolves/1,000 km2 ± 0.33 [SE]) than in those without reduced moose density ( x ̄ = 5.02 wolves/1,000 km2 ± 0.52). However, the average number of wolves removed per year decreased under both conditions. After 9 years, there was a 35% reduction in the predicted difference in the annual removal between areas with and without moose reduction. Our results suggest that policies that do not reduce or stabilize moose abundance will result in the removal of more wolves to increase caribou abundance. Like wolf reductions, moose reductions can also be controversial and affect local harvesters. Thus, understanding the consequences of actions that support caribou recovery is essential to supporting evidence‐based policy discussions.

Spring black bear harvest and predation pressure on moose calves in a multi‐predator system

Moose in wolf diets across northeastern Minnesota

The role of predation, forestry and productivity in moose harvest at different spatial levels of management units

Restoring historical moose densities results in fewer wolves killed for woodland caribou conservation

Lethal wolf control elicits change in moose habitat selection in unexpected ways

Management considerations of moose life‐history characteristics in Colorado, USA

Bear in mind! Bear presence and individual experience with calf survival shape the selection of calving sites in a long‐lived solitary ungulate

Wolf Predation on White‐tailed Deer Before, During, and After a Historically Mild Winter in Northern Minnesota

Population reduction by hunting helps control human-wildlife conflicts for a species that is a conservation success story

Temporal variations in female moose responses to roads and logging in the absence of wolves

No evidence hunting bait increases American black bear population growth in Maine, USA

Maternal behaviors influence survival of ungulate neonates under heavy predation risk

Age-at-harvest models as monitoring and harvest management tools for Wisconsin carnivores

Changing snow conditions are challenging moose (Alces alces) surveys in Alaska

Moose Habitat Selection and Fitness Consequences During Two Critical Winter Tick Life Stages in Vermont, United States†

White‐tailed deer population dynamics in a multipredator landscape shaped by humans

Spatial overlap of gray wolves and ungulate prey changes seasonally corresponding to prey migration

Direct and indirect effects of cougar predation on bighorn sheep fitness

Wolf density and predation patterns in the Canadian High Arctic

Vulnerable caribou and moose populations display contrasting responses to mountain pine beetle outbreaks and management.

Variable spatiotemporal ungulate behavioral response to predation risk