Abstract:Abstract Background The IBD-PODCAST study estimates the proportion of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) with suboptimal disease control (DC) in a real-world setting. Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is recommended in international guidelines as a non-invasive tool to assess disease activity and to guide therapeutic decisions in IBD. It is easy to use, inexpensive, can be repeatedly used without limitations and provides an opportunity for immediate patient interaction. The aim of this descriptive analysis was to assess the impact of IUS on the proportion of suboptimal DC in this cohort. Methods IBD PODCAST was a non-interventional, cross-sectional, multi-center study conducted across 103 sites in 10 countries. Criteria for suboptimal DC were based on STRIDE-II. Retrospective data on the frequency of imaging (i.e. endoscopies, MRI/MRE/CT and IUS) in the 12 months prior to assessment were collected. We compared clinical decision making, subjective evaluation of DC by patients and physicians and objective criteria of suboptimal DC at the time of assessment (i.e. index) in patients with (i.e. CD+IUS12, UC+IUS12) and without IUS (CD-IUS, UC-IUS) in the past 12 months. Results 2185 patients (CD: n=1108, UC n=1077) with a mean age (SD) of 44.0 (14.8) years and mean disease duration (SD) of 12.4 (9.2) years were included (52.2% male). Imaging was performed in 43.1% (n=477) of CD and 44.6% (n=480) of UC patients within 12 months prior to index. Endoscopy accounted for 77.6% and 88.8%, MRI/MRE/CT for 21.0% and 6.7%, and IUS for 19% (n=89/477) and 16% (n=77/480) of patients with CD and UC, respectively. The proportion of patients with signs of active inflammation at index was higher in patients where IUS was used (CD+IUS12: 34% vs CD-IUS: 9.5%; UC+IUS12: 22.6% vs UC-IUS: 15.3%; Table 1). For UC only, numerically more patients with parameters indicating clinically active disease at index were further monitored or had their treatment adjusted, when IUS was used within the past 12 months. (UC+IUS12: 58.6% vs UC-IUS: 50.7%). Despite the high number of patients with suboptimal DC based on objective criteria, the use of IUS minorly improved the alignment of subjective evaluation of suboptimal DC between the patient and physician, and only in UC (UC+IUS12: 37.5% vs UC-IUS: 32.7%; Fig 1). Conclusion Only a minority of patients underwent IUS in this cohort. Yet, this non-invasive tool may be useful if used more frequently. Consistent with others, IUS could aid in holistic disease monitoring for the detection of suboptimal treatment response, clinical decision making and the opportunity for alignment with patients on treatment targets.

Performance of a handheld point of care ultrasonography to assess IUD position compared to conventional transvaginal ultrasonography

The role of three-dimensional imaging in the investigation of IUD malposition

Evaluation of clinical performance when intrauterine devices are inserted by different categories of healthcare professional

Ease of removal of malpositioned IUDs: a retrospective cohort study

Ultrasound-guided repositioning technique for partially expelled intrauterine device: descriptive feasibility study

A Comparison of Special Intrauterine Balloons and Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices in the Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesions

Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Versus Urodynamics in Evaluating Insensible Urinary Incontinence: A Retrospective Study

Ultrasound location of intrauterine devices placed at cesarean section over the first year postpartum

Enhancing precision in hysteroscopic surgery: The role of intraoperative ultrasound

Women's experiences with the post-placental intrauterine device: a qualitative study

Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound and radiology-performed ultrasound for intussusception: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Point‐of‐Care Ultrasound in Critical Care Obstetrics

Case report: Uterine perforation caused by migration of intrauterine devices

Prospective Evaluation of Ease and Difficulties of 869 Cases of Intrauterine Devices Removals

Point-of-care ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology

Comparison of 6 handheld ultrasound devices by point-of-care ultrasound experts: a cross-sectional study

Clinical Evaluation of Li Brush Endometrial Samplers for Diagnosing Endometrial Lesions in Women With Intrauterine Devices

OP09.02: Comparing handheld point of care ultrasound to standard care with transvaginal ultrasound in early pregnancy

The contradictive findings between ultrasound, hysteroscopy and cytokines in women with nonhormonal IUDs suffering from menorrhagia: a prospective study

Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in the Intensive Care Unit for the Obstetric Patient

P808 Use of intestinal ultrasound influences the proportion of suboptimally controlled patients: IBD Podcast Study results