Point‐of‐Care Ultrasound in Critical Care Obstetrics

Juliana G. Martins,Jerri Waller,Rebecca Horgan,Tetsuya Kawakita,Camille Kanaan,Alfred Abuhamad,George Saade
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16425
2024-02-08
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Abstract:Objectives To synthesize the current evidence of maternal point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) in obstetrics. A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane library from inception through October 2023. Methods Studies were eligible for inclusion if they described the use of POCUS among obstetric or postpartum patients. Two authors independently screened all abstracts. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed‐methods studies were eligible for inclusion. Case reports of single cases, review articles, and expert opinion articles were excluded. Studies describing detailed maternal nonobstetric sonograms or maternal first trimester sonograms to confirm viability and rule out ectopic pregnancy were also excluded. Data were tabulated using Microsoft Excel and summarized using a narrative review and descriptive statistics. Results A total of 689 publications were identified through the search strategy and 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies evaluated the use of lung POCUS in obstetrics in different clinical scenarios. Lung ultrasound (LUS) findings in preeclampsia showed an excellent ability to detect pulmonary edema (area under the receiver operating characteristic 0.961) and findings were correlated with clinical evidence of respiratory distress (21 of 57 [37%] versus 14 of 109 [13%]; P = .001). Three studies evaluated abdominal POCUS, two of the inferior vena cava (IVC) to predict postspinal anesthesia hypotension (PSAH) and fluid receptivity and one to assess the rate of ascites in patients with preeclampsia. Patients with PSAH had higher IVC collapsibility (area under the curve = 0.950, P
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,acoustics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?