Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound and radiology-performed ultrasound for intussusception: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Po-Yang Tsou,Yu-Hsun Wang,Yu-Kun Ma,Julia K Deanehan,Jason Gillon,Eric H Chou,Tzu-Chun Hsu,Yuan-Chun Huang,Judy Lin,Chien-Chang Lee,Julia K. Deanehan,Eric H. Chou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.006
IF: 3.6
2019-09-01
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Abstract:<h3>Objective</h3><p>It is unclear whether point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) by emergency medicine physicians is as accurate as radiology-performed ultrasound (RADUS). We aim to summarize the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for intussusception and to compare the performance between POCUS and RADUS.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Databases were searched from inception through February 2018 using pre-defined index terms. Peer-reviewed primary studies that investigated the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for intussusception in children were included. The study is reported using Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA). Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for intussusception was conducted using the random-effects bivariate model. Subgroup analysis (POCUS vs RADUS) was also performed. Meta-regression was utilized to determine if the diagnostic accuracy between POCUS and RADUS was significantly different.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty studies (<em>n</em> = 5249) were included in the meta-analysis. Ultrasonography for intussusception has a sensitivity: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.98), specificity: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–0.99), positive likelihood ratio: 43.8 (95% CI: 18.0–106.7) and negative likelihood ratio: 0.03 (95% CI: 0.02–0.04), with an area under ROC (AUROC) curve of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98–1.00). Meta-regression suggested no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy for intussusception between POCUS and RADUS (AUROC: 0.95 vs 1.00, <em>p</em> = 0.128).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Current evidence suggested POCUS has a high diagnostic accuracy for intussusception not significantly different from that of RADUS.</p>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?