Abstract:BACKGROUND:Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common types of intracranial haematoma, and often occurs in older people. Burr-hole craniostomy, which is an evacuation through one or two burr holes drilled over the site of the haematoma, has been widely accepted as the most effective way to manage CSDH. Recurrences are a major problem and need reoperation, sometimes repeatedly. OBJECTIVES:To assess the effects and safety of the use of external drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of CSDH in adults. SEARCH METHODS:We ran our first search on 27 November 2014. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase Classic+Embase (OvidSP), PubMed, ISI WOS (SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S and CPSI-SSH), Chinese databases, and clinical trials registers, and screened reference lists. In compliance with the MECIR conduct standard 37, the Cochrane Injuries Group Information Specialist ran an update search within 12 months of publication (25 April 2016). We have screened these results but not incorporated the findings into the current review; as a result of the update search, one trial is awaiting classification. SELECTION CRITERIA:We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared external subdural drains with no drains after burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of CSDH in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:Two review authors identified potential articles from the literature search, extracted data independently using a data extraction form and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. For dichotomous data, where statistical heterogeneity was low, we calculated summary risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals using a fixed-effect model. MAIN RESULTS:Nine RCTs, including a total of 968 participants, reported outcomes specified by this review. Only one RCT reported the use of an adequate method of allocation concealment; this trial was a large, single-centre, high quality study and was adequately reported. All included trials reported a reduced recurrence of CSDH with external subdural drains. We found a significant reduction in the risk of recurrence with subdural drains (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.61, I(2) = 38%; 9 studies, 968 participants; moderate-quality evidence). There was no strong evidence of any increase in complications (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.72, I(2) = 0%; 7 studies, 710 participants; low-quality evidence), mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.33, I(2) = 22%; 5 studies, 539 participants; low-quality evidence), or poor functional outcome (which included deaths) (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.05, I(2) = 31%; 5 studies, 490 participants; low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:There is some evidence that postoperative drainage is effective in reducing the symptomatic recurrence of CSDH. Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Due to the low quality of the evidence for the secondary outcomes, the effect of drainage on the occurrence of surgical complications, mortality and poor functional outcome is uncertain. This uncertainty can be clarified with data from high-quality studies which may be conducted in the future. There is no strong evidence of any increase in complications when drains are used.

The utility of surgical drains in adult and pediatric posterior spinal fusion: systematic review and meta-analysis

External drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma in adults.

A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Role of Spinal Surgery Drainage Techniques in Postoperative Outcomes: Insights From a Comprehensive Literature Review

Do postoperative drain volumes correlate with intraoperative blood loss and postoperative transfusion requirements in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

The Use of Closed Suction Drainage in Lumbar Spinal Surgery: Is It Really Necessary?

The impact of closed suction wound drainage on chronic pain and health-related quality of life after posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

The utility of lumbar drains in modern endoscopic skull base surgery

Effect of wound drainage on the wound infection and healing in patients undergoing spinal surgery: A meta‐analysis

Use of Spinal Anesthesia during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Prophylactic Peri-Nephric Drain Placement in Renal Transplant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Closed drainage versus non-drainage for single-level lumbar discectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

Impact of intra‐abdominal drains in emergency gastrointestinal surgery: a scoping review

[Risk factors associated with massive drainage after posterior spinal orthopaedic surgery for adolescent scoliosis].

Drain versus no drain after hip hemi-arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures; differences in clinical outcomes

Safety and validity of selective cerebrospinal fluid drainage in open and endovascular aortic repair

Recent evidence for subcutaneous drains to prevent surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Drain versus no-drain after gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Systematic review of the effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on outcomes after endovascular type B aortic dissection repair

Efficacy and utility of antifibrinolytics in pediatric spine surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Prophylactic Intra-Abdominal Drainage During Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis