Abstract:Abstract Background Postoperative epidural haematoma and wound infection can cause devastating neurological damage in spinal surgery. Closed drainage is a common method to prevent epidural haematoma, infection and related neurological impairment after lumbar decompression; however, it is not clear whether drainage can reduce postoperative complications and improve clinical efficacy. This randomized study aims to explore the role of closed drainage in reducing postoperative complications and improving the clinical efficacy of single-level lumbar discectomy. Methods A total of 420 patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation were finally included in this study (169 females and 251 males, age 50.0 ± 6.4 years). A total of 214 patients were randomly assigned to the closed drainage group, and 206 patients were assigned to the non-drainage group. The incidence of postoperative fever, symptomatic epidural haematoma, wound infection and the need for revision surgery were compared between the two groups by the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the improvement of pain relief and the recovery of lumbar function. The VAS and ODI scores were compared between the two groups using t tests. Results The complications of the two groups were compared and analysed. There was only a statistically significant difference in the postoperative fever rate ( p = 0.022), as the non-drainage group had a higher fever rate, but there were no significant differences in the rates of symptomatic epidural haematoma, wound infection or revision operation ( p > 0.05). After concrete analysis, for the rate of fever less than 38.5 degrees, there was a statistically significant difference ( p = 0.027), but there was no significant difference when the fever was greater than 38.5 degrees ( p > 0.05). When comparing the VAS scores of the operation area on the first day after the operation, the pain relief in the closed drainage group was significantly better than that in the non-drainage group, with scores of 5.1 ± 0.8 and 6.0 ± 0.7, respectively ( p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the other VAS scores of operation areas, the VAS scores of the lower extremity, or the ODI scores ( p > 0.05). Conclusions For single-level lumbar discectomy, closed drainage is beneficial for reducing postoperative low-grade fever and relieving pain in the operation area in the very early postoperative stage. However, drainage does not have a significant impact on reducing the incidence of postoperative complications or improving clinical efficacy. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR1800016005 , May/06/2018, retrospectively registered.

Effect of wound drainage on the wound infection and healing in patients undergoing spinal surgery: A meta‐analysis

Role of Spinal Surgery Drainage Techniques in Postoperative Outcomes: Insights From a Comprehensive Literature Review

Effect of intra‐wound vancomycin on the surgical site wound infection after spinal surgery: A meta‐analysis

Influence of closed‐incision negative‐pressure wound therapy on the incidence of surgical site wound infection in patients undergoing spine surgery: A meta‐analysis

In‐hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: A meta‐analysis

Effects of negative‐pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical‐site wound infection after vascular surgery: A meta‐analysis

Effectiveness of nursing intervention in the operating room to prevent wound infections in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery: A meta‐analysis

Do we really need closed-suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis

The Use of Closed Suction Drainage in Lumbar Spinal Surgery: Is It Really Necessary?

Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on the incidence of deep surgical site infections after orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review

The utility of surgical drains in adult and pediatric posterior spinal fusion: systematic review and meta-analysis

Closed drainage versus non-drainage for single-level lumbar discectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

Effect of different surgical techniques on postoperative wound infection in patients with uterine prolapse: A meta‐analysis

Effects of operating room nursing intervention on wound infection in patients undergoing ovarian cysts surgery: A meta‐analysis

Effects of rapid rehabilitation nursing on surgical‐site wound infection and postoperative complications of patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis

Effect of passive versus active abdominal drainage on wound infection after pancreatectomy: A meta‐analysis

Effects of negative pressure wound therapy on wound infection and healing in patients with open fracture wounds: A meta‐analysis

Effects of clinical nursing pathway on surgical site wound infection in patients undergoing acute appendicitis surgery: A meta‐analysis

Effects of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on wound infection of surgery in patients with prostate cancer: A meta‐analysis

Effects of quality nursing on the surgical site wound infections in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery: A meta‐analysis

Effects of thoracoscopic lobectomy on surgical wound infection in patients with lung cancer: A meta‐analysis