Abstract:Study design: A consecutive series of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, treated between 1968 and 1977 before age 21 years with distraction and fusion using Harrington rods (surgically treated: n = 156; 145 females and 11 males) were followed-up at least 20 years after completion of the treatment. Objectives: To determine the long-term outcome in terms of back pain and function in patients surgically treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of background data: Few reports on long-term outcome of back pain and function have previously been presented for this group of patients. Results presented are not conclusive regarding effects on back pain and its correlation to a fusion extending into the lower lumbar spine. Materials and methods: One hundred forty-two (91%) of the patients were reexamined as part of an unbiased personal follow-up. This included a clinical examination and evaluation of curve size (Cobb method) and degenerative findings in full standing frontal and lateral radiographs. Validated questionnaires in terms of general and disease-specific quality of life aspects as well as present back and pain symptoms were used. One hundred thirty-nine had complete follow-up. An age- and sex-matched control group of 100 individuals was randomly selected and subjected to the same examinations. Results: The deterioration of the curves was 3.5 degrees for all curves and eight (5.1%) of the patients treated with fusion had undergone some additional curve-related surgical procedure. The patients had significantly more degenerative disc changes than the controls. Lumbar pain, although mild (2.4 on visual analogue scale), was significantly more frequent among the patients than the controls (65 vs. 47%, P = 0.0079). Only 25% of the patients admitted daily pain, and analgesics were sparsely used. No major differences of back function and general health-related quality of life were noted between the patients or the controls. Except for having been on sick-leave ever because of the back (45% vs. 19%, P = 0.0040) no differences could be seen in sociodemographic variables between the groups. Furthermore, no differences could be found between patients fused to L3 or higher (n = 102) versus L4 or lower (n = 37). No correlation could be found between pain and its localization and various variables on the scoliotic curve, body mass index, or smoking. Persisting discomfort and/or sensory loss were noted significantly more often among the patients who had the autologous bone harvesting performed through a separate incision over the iliac crest (24.3%) than among those in whom this was performed through an elongated midline incision (4.6%, P = 0.0015). Conclusions: Minimal pain and no dysfunction occurred (mean) 23 years after fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis compared with normal straight controls. Significantly more pain in the scar region occurred when bone graft from an incision over the posterior iliac crest was used for harvesting bone to the fusion compared with an incision performed as an elongation of the midline incision used for the scoliosis surgery.

Long-term kinetics of phosphate release from soil.

A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

The utility of surgical drains in adult and pediatric posterior spinal fusion: systematic review and meta-analysis

Back pain and function 23 years after fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study-part II

Do postoperative drain volumes correlate with intraoperative blood loss and postoperative transfusion requirements in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Closed drainage versus non-drainage for single-level lumbar discectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

Complications following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study using the modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink system

Intravenous lidocaine infusion therapy and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in adolescents undergoing idiopathic scoliosis correction: A retrospective study

Prophylactic closed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy following posterior instrumented spinal fusion: a single surgeon's experience and cost-benefit analysis

GATA-like protein-1 (GLP-1) is required for normal germ cell development during embryonic oogenesis.

412 Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Following Posterior Instrumented Spinal Fusion: A Single Surgeon’s Experience and Cost-Benefit Analysis

Minimally invasive surgery versus standard posterior approach for Lenke Type 1–4 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter, retrospective study

Comparison of 2 Methods of Incision Closure in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery.

[Metabolic syndrome: a high-cardiovascular risk].

Long-term clinical outcomes of selective segmental transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Incidence, Prevalence, and Analysis of Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: ≥2-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Study

Clinical and radiological outcome of stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (SAPF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). A propensity-matched cohort study

Is Next-day Discharge Safe After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive sacro-iliac joint surgery: a cohort study based on the Swedish Spine Registry

Video-assisted anterior thoracoscopic spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion: a comparative study utilizing the SRS-22 outcome instrument

Analysis of duration of different stages of surgery in posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients: comparison between severe versus non-severe AIS