Abstract:Objective:To investigate the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and the necessity to perform LLIF plus posterior direct decompression in the treatment of severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).Methods:In this prospective randomized, controlled trial, we assigned 71 patients, who were 50 to 80 years old, and diagnosed with severe DLSS (Schizas Classification grade C on magnetic resonance imaging), in a 1∶1 ratio to undergo either one-stage LLIF plus posterior internal fixation (treatment group) or CLIF plus posterior internal fixation with laminectomy (control group). Demographic and perioperative data were collected and compared. The clinical outcome measures included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) score as well as visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients were followed up for at least 1 year.Results:The treatment group included 36 patients with 46 surgical levels, while the control group included 35 patients with 46 surgical levels. The baseline demographic data of the 2 groups were equivalent in preoperative central canal areas, spinal canal anteroposterior diameter, disc height, ODI, ZCQ score for symptom severity and physical function, as well as VAS scores for back and leg pain. The mean operative time, blood loss, drainage volume and hospital stay of the treatment group are significantly less than the control group (157.2±29.1 min vs. 180.6±26.8 min, 75.6±39.1 ml vs. 108.6±43.3 ml, 136.9±73.9 ml vs. 220.5±121.3 ml, 5.3±1.1 d vs. 6.6±2.3 d). There were 2 cases with dura tear and 1 case with wound infection in control group. Thus, the surgical trauma and complications of the control group were more than the treatment group. At 1-year follow-up, the mean ODI score of treatment group improved from 42.24%±10.70% preoperatively to 18.21%±11.49%, the mean ZCQ symptom severity from 2.89±0.38 to 1.61±0.41, the mean ZCQ physical function from 2.31±0.45 to 1.50±0.37, the mean VAS for back from 5.56±1.19 to 1.97±1.13 and the mean VAS for leg from 4.44±1.81 to 0.94±1.26. At 1-year follow-up, the mean ODI score of the control group improved from 43.65%±14.93% preoperatively to 17.36%±12.15%, the mean ZCQ symptom severity from 2.92±0.52 to 1.65±0.39, the mean ZCQ physical function from 2.37±0.52 to 1.55±0.39, the mean VAS for back from 5.63±1.40 to 2.34±1.47, and the mean VAS for leg from 4.37±2.14 to 0.83±1.20. The ZCQ satisfactory score of both groups were not significant different (1.25±0.45 vs. 1.26±0.43, t=0.07, P=0.944). The mean improvement rate of both groups for ODI, ZCQ symptom severity, ZCQ physical function, VAS back and VAS leg at 1-year follow-up were not significant different (55.43%±27.74% vs. 58.36%±25.06%, 43.07%±17.22% vs. 42.66%±12.95%, 32.25%±23.65% vs. 31.71%±23.24%, 62.65%±21.25% vs. 58.37%±22.44%, 78.94%±26.41% vs. 85.45%±20.53%). One adjacent segment disease was found in each group at 1 year follow-up. Conclusion:CLIF+ posterior internal fixation in the treatment of Schizas Grade C DLSS has satisfactory clinical outcome at 1-year follow-up. Laminectomy increases surgical trauma, but does not significantly improve the clinical outcome at 1-year follow-up.

Long-term clinical outcomes of selective segmental transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Selective Segmental Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion

Posterior-only approach with selective segmental TLIF for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

[Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Selective Segmental Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis].

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for severe lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up

Posterolateral lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Radiographic and Clinical Outcome of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Extreme Lumbar Spinal Stenosis of Schizas Grade D: a Retrospective Study

[Posterior approach to treatment of spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar scoliosis].

Selective surgical treatment for degenerative scoliosis

Clinical value of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior navigation and long segment internal fixation in the treatment of degenerative scoliosis

Posterior decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Long-term results of single-stage posterior hemivertebra resection and short segment fusion using pedicle screws fixation in thoracolumbar congenital early-onset scoliosis: an 8.97-year average follow-up study

Long term follow-up after posterior corrective operation for degenerative scoliosis

Influence Of Posterior Instrumentation And Fusion In Different Segments On The Surgical Parameters And Spinal-Pelvic Parameters Of Patients With Degenerative Scoliosis

Long-term outcome and associated factors of lumbar decompression, internal fixation and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis

[Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of the over 5-Year Follow-Up Study of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Treated with Posterior Decompression and Instrumented Fusion].

Does Simultaneous Fusion of Preexisting Spinal Canal Stenosis Adjacent to Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Achieve a Better Clinical Outcome? A Retrospective Study with More than 5-year Follow-Up

Clinical Study of Posterior Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

The Radiological Outcomes of One-Stage Posterior-Only Hemivertebra Resection and Short Segmental Fusion for Lumbosacral Hemivertebra: a Minimum of 5 Years of Follow-Up

A meta-analysis of the outcomes of posterior long-segment ifxation with different upper instrumented vertebrae for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Selected Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Canal Stenosis Associated with Degenerative Scoliosis