The potential utility of HKUST-1 for adsorptive removal of benzene vapor from gaseous streams using a denuder versus a packed-bed adsorption system

Bhaskar Anand,Sherif A. Younis,Jan E. Szulejko,Ki-Hyun Kim,Wei Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122359

IF: 11.1

2020-12-01

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:<p>The feasibility of various sorption methods has been explored to remove volatile organic compounds from indoor air (e.g., a packed bed-based air filtration/purification system). However, the large space velocity/pressure drop is a common operational challenge associated with the use of a packed-bed adsorber. Accordingly, this research was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of two contrasting adsorptive removal systems (i.e., denuder vs. packed-bed) using a metal-organic framework (MOF: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST-1) as a model adsorbent) as the test media. In the denuder design, HKUST-1 was coated as a thin layer (thickness 90 μm) on the inner wall of a 90 mm length quartz tube (internal diameter ≈ 4 mm) with the help of a polyvinyl alcohol binder. Additionally, an identical quartz tube was prepared with a HKUST-1 packed bed. The potential applicability of the denuder versus packed-bed was evaluated using gaseous benzene (0.1–10 partial pressure) in a N₂ inlet stream at near-ambient conditions (298 K and 1 atm). A comparison of the breakthrough volume and adsorption performance data (capacity and partition coefficient) revealed that the packed bed outperformed the denuder design by four to five fold at all inlet benzene partial pressures (0.1–10 Pa). Better performance was seen in the denuder system when benzene uptake was conducted at high benzene partial pressures (5–10 Pa) rather than at low partial pressure (&lt;5 Pa) in the inlet stream. The evaluation of pressure drop data indicated the efficacy of the denuder over a packed bed in terms of pressure/space velocity drop, especially at a high flow rate (e.g., 330 mL/min). However, in terms of uptake rate and space time yield, the denuder was 25 times less efficient than the packed bed.</p>

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental