Abstract:Importance Current left bundle branch block (LBBB) criteria are based on animal experiments or mathematical models of cardiac tissue conduction and may misclassify patients. Improved criteria would impact referral decisions and device type for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Objective To develop a simple new criterion for LBBB based on electrophysiological studies of human patients, and then to validate this criterion in an independent population. Design, Setting, and Participants In this diagnostic study, the derivation cohort was from a single-center, prospective study of patients undergoing electrophysiological study from March 2016 through November 2019. The validation cohort was assembled by retrospectively reviewing medical records for patients from the same center who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) from October 2015 through May 2022. Exposures Patients were classified as having LBBB or intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) as assessed by intracardiac recording. Main Outcomes and Measures Sensitivity and specificity of the electrocardiography (ECG) criteria assessed in patients with LBBB or IVCD. Results A total of 75 patients (median [IQR] age, 63 [53-70.5] years; 21 [28.0%] female) with baseline LBBB on 12-lead ECG underwent intracardiac recording of the left ventricular septum: 48 demonstrated complete conduction block (CCB) and 27 demonstrated intact Purkinje activation (IPA). Analysis of surface ECGs revealed that late notches in the QRS complexes of lateral leads were associated with CCB (40 of 48 patients [83.3%] with CCB vs 13 of 27 patients [48.1%] with IPA had a notch or slur in lead I; P = .003). Receiver operating characteristic curves for all septal and lateral leads were constructed, and lead I displayed the best performance with a time to notch longer than 75 milliseconds. Used in conjunction with the criteria for LBBB from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society, this criterion had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI, 56%-83%) and specificity of 74% (95% CI, 54%-89%) in the derivation population, contrasting with a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 86%-99%) and specificity of 33% (95% CI, 17%-54%) for the Strauss criteria. In an independent validation cohort of 46 patients (median [IQR] age, 78.5 [70-84] years; 21 [45.7%] female) undergoing TAVR with interval development of new LBBB, the time-to-notch criterion demonstrated a sensitivity of 87% (95% CI, 74%-95%). In the subset of 10 patients with preprocedural IVCD, the criterion correctly distinguished IVCD from LBBB in all cases. Application of the Strauss criteria performed similarly in the validation cohort. Conclusions and Relevance The findings suggest that time to notch longer than 75 milliseconds in lead I is a simple ECG criterion that, when used in conjunction with standard LBBB criteria, may improve specificity for identifying patients with LBBB from conduction block. This may help inform patient selection for cardiac resynchronization or conduction system pacing.

Abstract 4142700: Inverse Decremental Conduction in the Left Bundle Following Cardiac Surgery: Potential Clinical Implications

Abstract 4136989: Association of Alternating PR Intervals with Paroxysmal Atrioventricular Block in Patients with Right Bundle Branch Block Following Cardiac Surgery

Rapid Reversal of Heart Failure by Correcting Left Bundle Branch Block Induced by Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Current Opinions on New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and the Search for Physiological Pacing

Inverse decremental conduction heralds complete atrioventricular block following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

AP19-00648 Abstract View

P309Aortic valve implantation-induced bundle branch block as a framework towards a more uniform electrocardiographic definition of left bundle branch block

Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block.

Clinical implications of new-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: analysis of the PARTNER experience.

The Predictors of Conduction Disturbances Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve: A Multicenter Study

PO-04-043 ALTERNATING PR AND RP INTERVALS PRIOR TO COMPLETE AV BLOCK: THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG?

Electrophysiological evaluation following development of new and persistent left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A single center pilot study

A Revised Definition of Left Bundle Branch Block Using Time to Notch in Lead I

Aortic valve implantation-induced conduction block as a framework towards a uniform electrocardiographic definition of left bundle branch block

Impact of left bundle branch block or permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve replacement on mid-term left ventricular ejection fraction

Incidence and Outcomes of New-Onset Right Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Conduction dynamics over time after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An expert review

Title: Recurrent pacemaker-mediated arrhythmia with a right bundle branch block pattern in a patient with CRT device

Impact factors of new-onset complete left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and its effects on cardiac remodeling reversal

Prognostic Outcome of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Analysis of the Characteristics of Delayed High-Degree Atrioventricular Block after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement