PO-04-043 ALTERNATING PR AND RP INTERVALS PRIOR TO COMPLETE AV BLOCK: THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG?

Jenna Spears,Thomas Kutner,Farah Olleik,Gan-Xin Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1241

IF: 6.779

2023-01-01

Heart Rhythm

Abstract:The incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation for high-degree AV block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is approximately 6%, because of mechanical damage to the conduction system. We report a novel ECG marker, i.e. inverse decremental conduction (IDC), that heralds paroxysmal AV block. Case report and exploration of the electrophysiological mechanism. N/A A 73-year-old male with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis underwent TAVR with a balloon-expandable valve. On day 1 post-TAVR, his 12-lead ECG revealed sinus rhythm with a normal PR interval and unchanged RBBB with a left anterior fascicular block (LAFB). The patient was discharged with mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry. Although the patient was asymptomatic, he was asked to come to the emergency department (ED) after his monitor detected a 3.5-second pause during sleep. Shortly after a 12-lead ECG was obtained in the ED, he experienced two sudden cardiac arrests due to complete AV block and asystole requiring CPR and transcutaneous pacing. He underwent emergent implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker. His ECG in the ED reveals alternating PR intervals (Figure). The first impression of the alternating PR intervals is a dual AV nodal physiology with a 2:1 block in the fast pathway, a relatively benign ECG sign. However, paroxysmal AV block and recent history of TAVR suggested a His-Purkinje injury with block at the subnodal level. More specifically, TAVR-related IDC in the left posterior fascicle (LPF) underlies alternating PR intervals in the setting of RBBB and LAFB. In other words, the PR length is proportional to the preceding RP length, i.e. a longer RP leads to a longer subsequent PR and vice versa due to IDC in LPF. The injured His-Purkinje fibers may lose their all-or-none conduction property and display IDC post-TAVR. This manifests as LBBB with a duration proportional to the preceding RP or RR interval or as prolongation of the PR interval with lengthening of the preceding RP interval in presence of RBBB. IDC in the His-Purkinje may be masked by decremental conduction in the AV node and is often under-recognized. Once the PR interval prolongs with lengthening of the preceding RP interval post-TAVR, unrelated to vagal stimulation, insertion of a temporary or permanent pacemaker is urgently indicated. Alternating PR intervals can be a benign finding, but in this case were linked with paroxysmal AV block secondary to IDC, with resultant cardiac arrest post-TAVR.