Dynamic site-interconversion reduces the induction period of methanol-to-olefin conversion

Toyin Omojola
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-wpr4m-v2
2024-10-07
Abstract:Reaction-diffusion coupling across the catalyst pore (active sites, catalyst surface), grain, pellet and reactor bed has been studied using a combination of theoretical concepts, and a particle-resolved transient microkinetic model applied to temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), and step response studies of methanol, and dimethyl ether conversion over ZSM-5 catalysts. TPD profile resolution shows coupling between adsorption, desorption, and diffusion across scales. Six models (coverage, anomalous diffusion, mass transfer of gas, and adsorbed phase, fixed site-interconversion, and dynamic site-interconversion) are investigated to describe the 44-min induction period in the first step-response cycle and the 95% reduction in induction period in subsequent cycles of dimethyl ether conversion. For the first time, we show that the reduction in induction period is not due to a zeolite-occluded pool (or coverage) effect. Dynamic interconversion across three site ensembles allows for the prediction of the induction period of propylene formation. Adsorption, desorption, and surface reaction of dimethyl ether occurs alongside with competitive adsorption of water and methanol leading to stable intermediates that produce propylene. The reduction in induction period is due to an autocatalytic transformation between three different reactive site ensembles. The first site ensemble retains the kinetic function of the first step response cycle while the second and third site ensemble adopt a new kinetic function due to transformation conveyed by surface methoxy species. The dynamic site interconversion model agrees with results from temperature-programmed surface reaction studies and are tenable for understanding the reduction in induction period and increasing the process efficiency particularly during start-up and steady-state conversion of methanol to olefins.
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Explain and model the shortening of the induction period in the process of methanol conversion to olefins (especially the conversion of dimethyl ether to propylene)**. Specifically, the paper explores the following issues: 1. **Causes of the induction period**: - In the first step - response cycle, there is an induction period of 44 minutes for the reaction of dimethyl ether conversion to propylene. - In the subsequent step - response cycles, the induction period is significantly shortened by 95%. What are the reasons for this phenomenon? 2. **The role of dynamic site - conversion**: - The paper proposes a new mechanism - **dynamic site - interconversion** to explain the shortening of the induction period. - Through research, it is found that dynamic site - conversion occurs among three different sets of active sites, and these sets of sites change their kinetic functions under the conversion of surface methoxy species. 3. **The influence of reaction - diffusion coupling**: - The coupling effects of reaction and diffusion between catalyst pores, particles, catalyst spheres and reactor beds are studied. - The temperature - programmed desorption (TPD) and step - response experiments are simulated using a particle - resolved transient microkinetic model, revealing the interactions among adsorption, desorption and diffusion processes. 4. **Combination of theory and experiment**: - The paper combines theoretical concepts and experimental data to verify the validity of the dynamic site - conversion model. - Through temperature - programmed surface reaction (TPSR) research, the rationality of the dynamic site - conversion model is further supported. ### Summary The main purpose of this paper is to explain the phenomenon of the shortening of the induction period in the process of methanol conversion to olefins by introducing the concept of dynamic site - conversion, and to provide a new modeling method to understand and optimize this process. This method not only helps to understand the reaction mechanism, but also can improve the catalytic efficiency in industrial production, especially in the start - up and steady - state conversion stages. ### Formula representation To describe dynamic site - conversion and reaction - diffusion coupling, some key formulas are used in the paper: 1. **Relationship between coverage and vacancy fraction**: \[ \theta_i(t)=K_i(t,\theta_v)P_i\theta_v(t) \] where \(\theta_i\) is the coverage of species \(i\), \(K_i\) is the adsorption equilibrium constant of species \(i\), \(P_i\) is the partial pressure of species \(i\), and \(\theta_v\) is the coverage of vacancies. 2. **Temporal change of coverage**: \[ \frac{d\theta_i}{dt}=f(\theta_j,\theta_v,t) \] This describes the change of coverage with time, taking into account the influence of the coverage of other species and the vacancy fraction. These formulas help to explain the change of coverage under dynamic conditions and provide a theoretical basis for understanding the shortening of the induction period.