Estimating Cation Exchange Capacity from Hygroscopic Water Content Change

Chong Chen,Emmanuel Arthur,Hu Zhou,Xue Song,Jianying Shang,Markus Tuller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20764
IF: 2.9
2024-01-01
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Abstract:The existing models for estimating cation exchange capacity (CEC) from easy-to-measure hygroscopic water content (theta(h)) were based on a single water activity (a(w)) value rather than on the processes that govern soil water vapor adsorption for a distinct a(w) range. Here, we present a new CEC estimation model based on theta(h) data of 119 soils with different clay mineralogy (i.e., illitic [IL], montmorillonitic [ML], and kaolinitic [KA] samples) and organic carbon (OC) contents for the a(w) range from 0.23 to 0.57 (Delta theta(0.23-0.57)) and validate its performance. Based on the hypothesis that multilayer adsorption exhibits a higher correlation with CEC than monolayer adsorption and capillary condensation, the a(w) range from 0.23 to 0.57 was chosen with CEC calculated as CEC = k x Delta theta(0.23-0.57). The performance of the new model is compared to the Arthur (2017) model and the Torrent (2015) model, which considers a single theta(h) value. The average proportionality coefficient (k) varied with the dominant clay mineralogy of the investigated soils. For soils dominated by 2:1 clay minerals (i.e., IL and ML), the new model showed a good estimation accuracy (Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency [E] >= 0.85; root mean squared error [RMSE] <= 4.18 cmol((+)) kg(-1)). The new model performed better for IL and ML samples than for KA samples, and yielded more accurate CEC estimations than the Arthur model and Torrent model for soils with 2:1 clay minerals. For soil with high OC content (>23.2 g kg(-1)), the new model slightly underestimated CEC (E = 0.66; RMSE = 5.87).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?