Estimation of soil water content at permanent wilting point using hygroscopic water content

Chong Chen,Hu Zhou,Jianying Shang,Kelin Hu,Tusheng Ren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12887
IF: 4.178
2019-10-21
European Journal of Soil Science
Abstract:<p>Traditional methods for determining soil water content at permanent wilting point (θ<sub>PWP</sub>) are time‐consuming. The objectives of this study are to develop a model for predicting θ<sub>PWP</sub> based on easily measured hygroscopic water content, and to compare the performance of the proposed model versus three previous models: the Aina &amp; Periaswamy model (AP model), the van den Berg <i>et al</i>. model (vdB model), and the Seybold &amp; Harms model (SH model), which estimate θ<sub>PWP</sub> from particle size distribution and/or organic matter (OM) content. By assuming that the dry‐end of soil water retention curve could be described with the linear Campbell &amp; Shiozawa model, a simple linear model, θ<sub>PWP</sub> = 3θ<sub>RH50</sub>, was developed to predict θ<sub>PWP</sub> using θ<sub>RH50</sub>. The θ<sub>RH50</sub> of the soils ranged from 0.002 to 0.157 g g<sup>‐1</sup>, and the θ<sub>PWP</sub> ranged from 0.014 to 0.279 g g<sup>‐1</sup>. The validation results on 48 soils showed that the root mean squared errors (RMSE) and mean absolute error of the proposed model were 0.007 g g<sup>‐1</sup> and 0.005 g g<sup>‐1</sup>, respectively. Model comparison showed that the prediction accuracy of four models for θ<sub>PWP</sub> was in the order of proposed model &gt; AP model &gt; SH model &gt; vdB model. Thus, θ<sub>RH50</sub> is a viable predictor for θ<sub>PWP</sub>, which eliminates the need for soil particle size distribution and OM content.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>
soil science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?